Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Capitana

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Capitana



 * socks admits to this IP here
 * That is Danny 17.. not me --Capitana (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * socks admits to this IP here
 * That is Danny 17.. not me --Capitana (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * socks admits to this IP here
 * That is Danny 17.. not me --Capitana (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * trolling edit here

Previous related cases
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Danny 17
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Specialservice


 * Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence: WP:DUCK for a start.

Indef banned troll User:specialservice/User:Lancastria/User:Danny 17 is back, this time as User:Capitana, All the same hallmarks including trolling my talkpage again [here], and stalking all my edits. Blanking large numbers of my edits in one go [here] Prester John (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Absolute oppose. User is only posting this because I am discussing him on wikiquette for possible racist edits. I am sure many users have warned PJ I cannot be the first. We can't all be socks! See WP:ANI. I am discussing PJ's threat to post me on RFCU with admins. It seems (from the above) that PJ orders checkusers on anyone who gives him a sharp word about his conduct. Checkuser is not for fishing --Capitana (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Also - no arbcom ruling has been made - "Cat:B" has been used anyway - this warrants a decline --Capitana (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * NOTE - The reporter is asking friendly admins to conduct the check themselves http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=192366654&oldid=192302011 - not to insult Deskana but I believe Prester John believes he will recieve an advantage and that his frivolous checkuser request may be accepted if he contacts specific admins. --Capitana (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Deskana handled previous cases and is the most experienced with this particular troll. In closing statements of [Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Danny 17]] [here] Deskana refers to the socks accusations of my "racism", another hallmark of User:Capitana Prester John (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: And you've been hopping around various locales as well.   . Let the CU request go through or if its bad faith, then let it fail. No need to keep pressing on about it.   Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I will bloody well go on about it! Because PJ knows I have used one of the above IP's. I'll tell you how he knows - because I asked for it to be blocked! He knows it will come up positive because I got the address blocked in the first place. That's his intention! --Capitana (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't have info on Danny 17 and the others, but every other account on the IPs involved has been blocked as a sockpuppet or obvious vandal account, and the underlying IPs have multiple vandalism blocks as well. Thatcher 20:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The listed accounts are too old for a standard check, however Deskana may have saved the results of his prior check. Thatcher 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ that Capitana is Lancastria. Behavioural patterns and checkuser data both match. --Deskana (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''