Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Captain Flame Guy

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Captain Flame Guy

 * Code G:
 * Supporting evidence: Found this new account yesterday while looking through the new accounts page. The naming convention is classic MascotGuy.  I first went to AIV, then I left a gentle warning on the talk page basically telling the guy he was caught and which actually gave him a chance to respond.  An admin thought I might be in violation of WP:BITE, offered to remove my note and replace it with a welcome to which I agreed.  As is the case with MascotGuy, he abandons his accounts once caught and no edits have yet to come from the account.  Would someone please see if this latest possible sock really is a sock?  Thanks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence: Found this new account yesterday while looking through the new accounts page. The naming convention is classic MascotGuy.  I first went to AIV, then I left a gentle warning on the talk page basically telling the guy he was caught and which actually gave him a chance to respond.  An admin thought I might be in violation of WP:BITE, offered to remove my note and replace it with a welcome to which I agreed.  As is the case with MascotGuy, he abandons his accounts once caught and no edits have yet to come from the account.  Would someone please see if this latest possible sock really is a sock?  Thanks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ❌. Sam Korn (smoddy) 14:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Just a coincidence, then.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ... or he found a new access point ;). Only time will tell! -- lucasbfr  talk 08:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''