Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Carlsher

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Carlsher



 * Code letter: D


 * Supporting evidence: Carlsher’s first and only edit is to agree with a nomination (see ) using wording consistent with that used by the nominator in the discussion (see ) and elsewhere (see ). Given the nominator’s history (see block log), there seems a reasonable chance that vote fixing could be occurring here.  The IP listed also has only one edit, which also happens to be to the same discussion.  As indicated below if the AfD closed as delete, which it did (see Articles for deletion/List of problems solved by MacGyver (3rd nomination)), a checkuser would be warranted.  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 23:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

❌ Based on currently available technical information. -- Avi (talk) 06:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Carlsher



 * Code letter: D


 * Supporting evidence: Carlsher’s first and only edit is to agree with a nomination (see ) using wording consistent with that used by the nominator in the discussion (see ) and elsewhere (see ). Given the nominator’s history (see block log), there seems a reasonable chance that vote fixing could be occurring here.  The IP listed also has only one edit, which also happens to be to the same discussion.  --A NobodyMy talk 02:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Vote is not closed yet, and possible sockpuppetry may not have an effect. Should the vote be closed as delete, then a CU check would be appropriate. -- Avi (talk) 02:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There could be another problem, though, if it is the nominator, then the nominator would be violating his unblock agreement. --A NobodyMy talk 02:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do NOT archive as we have to wait pending to the outcome of AfD. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''