Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cowboycaleb1

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Cowboycaleb1



 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence:
 * - CMJMEM edited mostly in September, except from the 18th to the 22nd of September.
 * At User talk:D.M.N., this happened on the 19th and 21st of September. Those two IP's were likely Caleb as well, as they are from the same general IP address number as Caleb's other IP's (see here). So while CMJMEM was away, those IP's vandalized D.M.N's talk page. The harassment apparently ended from Caleb to D.M.N. after those IP attack because D.M.N. has Caleb's MySpace deleted when he posted stuff encouraging people to come vandalize D.M.N.'s talk page. CMJMEM did not edit on the 25th of August, and on D.M.N's talk page, and IP vandalized late in the day on August 24. The edit was deleted from the talk page history, but he recorded the date and time here. Both Caleb and CMJMEM have very strong feelings on the List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees article, as you can see from Caleb's contribs. CMJMEM was just blocked for a week after being disruptive on the same page. (See here for more information). Also, D.M.N. changed his username from Davnel03 a while back. Caleb was blocked at the time. Caleb returned with a new account, Davnel03, the same as D.M.N.'s old account. He created the account to edit the List of WWE employees article.  iMa tth ew  14:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Just to add a bit in here. The IP addresses all direct back to Memphis, Tennesse, where Caleb has openly admitted that is where he lives. The main question is whether CMJMEM is Caleb, and, based on the above, I have my suspicions that they are the same person. The block log for Caleb also has a few blocks for general disruption, as does CMJMEM. D.M.N. (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Just to add a bit in here. The IP addresses all direct back to Memphis, Tennesse, where Caleb has openly admitted that is where he lives. The main question is whether CMJMEM is Caleb, and, based on the above, I have my suspicions that they are the same person. The block log for Caleb also has a few blocks for general disruption, as does CMJMEM. D.M.N. (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

looking at his contributions cowboycaleb1 only edited on wrestling pages.i do more than just edit on wrestling pages.this looks like a weak attempt to get rid if some one that you don't get along with.CMJMEM (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

imatthew talks about letting non involved admins handle this but does this for this check user case.CMJMEM (talk) 16:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you stalking my contributions, I really do. I've asked Rlevse to look at this case. He is an un-involved admin and checkuser. Somebody has to handle this case, and Rlevse asked me to remind him about it.  iMa tth ew  17:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

too old for direct comparison. =, however based on the info in the prior RFCU on Cowboy Caleb and on DMN's page, these two are ❌ to based on technical evidence.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Cowboycaleb1



 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence:

came to AN3 to complain about someone editing the talk page of a known sock of Cowboycaleb1 -. Based on edit interests, I'm assuming that Radiohead12 = Cowboycaleb1, but would like confirmation before making the block. Thank you. B (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

✅ that Radiohead12 == Bleek25, but Cowboycaleb1 is too old for direct comparison. Thatcher 04:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Cowboycaleb1



 * per
 * Code letter: G
 * per
 * Code letter: G

I have had several disputes with Caleb in the past few weeks. When I tried to contact him last week via his talkpage, he ignored and deleted my comment, see. A day after, I had a IP blank my talkpage, and replace it with a comment, see. A few days after, a very similar IP address (64.79.179.254 one) removed several topics from my talkpage, see. According to IP-Adress.com, these IP's direct back to Memphis, TN. In this post, he states his MySpace is. In the "About Me" section in his MySpace profile, it reads: "Hello to all. My name is Caleb. I’m a 24 year old black single man living in Memphis, TN." This seems to suggest that these IPs are attached to Caleb, but want this checkuser to confirm that is the case. Davnel03 18:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Caleb has left this on my page. It's clear he's keeping an eye on my edits. Davnel03 20:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also note this report on ANI before the recent harassment of Davnel03, here: . I think Cowboycaleb1 is perilously close to being blocked indefinitely without any need for checkuser to intervene (though it would be best to make sure of it). Shalom (Hello • Peace) 20:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

I would you to take a look at this. Davnel03 left it on my page after i left him this on his talk page a couple of weeks ago. i have since kept my distance from him. it seems to me that he i still wanting to start stuff with me. this dispute should be closed since there is no link between myself and these ip adress vandals. also Davnel03 has fallowed me in the past see here. User:Cowboycaleb1Cowboycaleb 04:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Added 1 more IP. Davnel03 15:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, see this. The user in question (Bobo54) was created to back up Caleb in a argument. Davnel03 15:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

. --Deskana (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * So what happens now? Just let this continue. It's either confirmed or not confirmed. "Possible" tells me nothing. Davnel03 09:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''