Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Crisspy

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Crisspy Part 2




At first, this user mistook an edit I made to my userpage as me saying I was leaving Wikipedia, and asked if I really left. I said they misunderstood and left it at that. Now however, they seem to have decided I need to be desysopped, a rather curious assumption for a new user to make. Examining the request for my desysopping shows a link to Crisspy. Below is the reasons he say I should be desysopped, with my commentary in brackets.


 * Unfair blocking of harmless accounts that never made any vandalistic edits. (likely referring to sockpuppets of User:Crisspy)
 * Blocked every user that was friends of another blocked/vandalistic user, unfairly judging it was a sockpuppet. (User:1028, a sockpuppet of Crisspy, claimed to me that he was not a sockpuppet in an email, but that he was a friend of Crisspy)
 * Never made any really helpful edits to wikipedia except for Star Wars and other childish subjects (Shows no link to Crisspy, although shows the user knows very little about Wikipedia)
 * Judging by his interests, is immature, and not what wikipedia needs as an administrator. (Excellent reasoning)
 * Only submitter of request for check user votes on various pages. (Check user votes? How does this user know about Checkuser? Perhaps because his old user page links to the checkuser policy?)

There is one addition piece of evidence that I would prefer to submit in private should it be required. This is a WP:BEANS issue. Revealing this information publicly may prevent Crisspy from evading further checkusers. I can talk on IRC to the checkuser evaluating this request if this evidence is required. --Lord Deskana (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

✅ Mackensen (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Crisspy


Anak'sed is my username backwards. All these accounts took a disliking to me, because I blocked 1028 for disruption. 'sed and Anak'sed are quite obviously sockpuppets of 1028. Recently, Requests for adminship/Crisspy was created. 'sed curiously voted support for this despite the fact that 1028 et al were regularly involved in "vandalising" Crisspy's userpage. They all seem to have an affinity for a "this user is insane" template, as well as "vandalism is OK here" and "vandal boxes". I have begun to suspect that Crisspy is a sockmaster of them all. Normally people give up when they keep getting blocked. However, 1028 is yet to give up... perhaps because he is Crisspy? An end to this would be appreciated. 'sed is getting tiring. He followed me to Requests for adminship/Yanksox, complained about my oppose, and voted support. So did Crisspy, quite "curiously". --Lord Deskana (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.
 * There are others I believe, but my memory escapes me. Many of these accounts edits will be too old to be checked, however they are listed here for completeness of the request and for verification of the violations of policies.

✅, Crisspy is definitely the sockmaster as well. List of additional accounts below:

--Mackensen (talk) 00:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''