Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CyberAnth

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

CyberAnth
Updated Code letter: B



User:Stephen_Ewen: I think this is the good hand account. He appears to be the writer attributed at the bottom of the Trinity article. the info at citizdium that it links to is identicale to the old info on one of the socks of Cyber. I am not good at providing links/ diffs. but if you would look into it and let me know what you think I'd be gratified. Funny how User:Ewenss is very similar to Stephen Ewen; his linked profile shows that he spent time in Micronesia and cm jones, an identified sock spent several years editing Saipan Sucks article here. http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Stephen_Ewen/Scratch_Pad4 and its side bar shows a similiar editing style to User:Ewenss and his side bar usage in the Trinity article .Anyhoo. I like the balance you've brought to this project and the Ronald Regan article is awesome.--Die4Dixie (talk) 06:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry to do this, it is a copy from a user's discussion page. the links should speak for themselves.
 * Hi, thanks for the message. I don't think User:Stephen Ewen is Ewenss/CyberAnth, because that IP address was blocked when the sockpuppets were exposed. Furthermore, the user appears to be heavily involved at Citizendium. I've just scanned over his contribs and could not find much evidence. If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks so much for the compliments :) Best, Happyme22 (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Compare this page creation with the profile at citizendium:. in his interactions with other users, the various avatars of cyberanth made much hay of the lack of scholarly edits by the other editors. a quick Google of Stephen Ewen will show the comments that he has made to the media in this vein. Follow up the history of the userpage of User:Ewenss, then look at how he used the essay that links to Stephen Eweness's one dated to MArch of 2008 at the bottom of the Trinity Church of Christ article. This article was not available on line in MArch. Cm. jones, anther sock of cyber anth added the template that the article was under construction, and then the newly presented article was put out by Ewenss. Ewenss had access to the article of Stephen Ewens before it was publicly available. I think that the use of the last name of the other in the creation of the sock is more than coincidental. then the backwards spelling of ewenss  for another of the socks is again more convincing. Finally, i think that User:Stephen_Ewen is a good hand account that he has used for other thing, but how coincidental that the sock of Cyber would have the same credentials as that of the user in question?Die4Dixie (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well it is entirely possible. I remember well the complaints by Ewenss regarding "scholarly sources", and Stephen Ewen appears to be doing the same. If you are genuinely concerned, you may request a check user at WP:RFCU. Happyme22 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)::::::::I find typing laborous with two fingers, please forgive.Die4Dixie (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Stephen Ewen's edits are too stale to check. Thatcher 22:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

CyberAnth
Updated Code letter: B






 * G: G


 * Supporting evidence: CyberAnth and I met at the article Jeremiah Wright controversy. The user has repeatedly disagreed with myself and other page editors, going against concensus (see Talk:Jeremiah Wright controversy). He began a section at Talk:Jeremiah Wright controversy entitled POV pushing, where he accused myself and two other editors of being uncivil and partisan. I was upset, and responded, justifying my actions. In that message, I told the user that I was an experienced editor and pointed to two articles which I greatly aided in becoming featured: Ronald Reagan and Nancy Reagan. CyberAnth then began stalking me and followed me over to the Ronald Reagan page, tagging the article for POV and unbalance. He also went to the Nancy Reagan page, and added in a claim that Mrs. Reagan was addicted to prescription medication. He then began a discussion at the Talk:Ronald Reagan page called Hero worship, calling the article "sanitized" and that he will be "working to introduce such critical material in a scholarly manner."

Following this, User:Bramlet Abercrombie edited the Reagan article exactly 19 minutes after CyberAnth. He edited it again a few minutes later. I am unsure if the user had ever edited the article before, and found it odd that Abercrombie and CyberAnth showed up less within than 20 minutes of each other amidst disagreements.

After an edit war, User:Cryptographic hash came to the page and restored the POV and unbalanced tags. I reverted it, and then CyberAnth added them back again. It was later undone as well. Cryptographic hash then added in a very critical piece of President Reagan, which I reverted for WP:WEIGHT and WP:NPOV concerns. That edit was deduced at the talk page to also be in violation of WP:RELIABLE.

I reported CyberAnth at WP:WQA (see the page here) where specualtion of the three being all sockpuppets was brought up. Therefore I am requesting this check IP address so that we can verify who is who, or whether they are all one person. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thatcher 04:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Bramlet is ❌.
 * ✅ that these accounts are the same person,
 * All blocked indef and tagged...like Thatcher said  Tiptoety  talk 04:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Update on Cyberanth
This editor is attempting to subvert the block placed on him for using sock puppets, using User:Daimerej, likely as well as IP 74.233.86.145 and possibly IP 64.66.192.62. Additionally, possibly User:Tucu.
 * Evidence This name was registered in the midst of the Jeremiah Wright controversy trouble. After Cyberanth's sock puppetry was discovered, this user tried to defend him. He then proceeded to make the exact same edits as Cyberanth (examples are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trinity_United_Church_of_Christ%2C_Chicago&action=history). I figured out who he was, and addressed it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trinity_United_Church_of_Christ%2C_Chicago. You'll find that he basically acknowledges who he is. He meanwhile is continuing his disruptive editing, sock puppetry, and hostile attitude (see: Articles for deletion/Joshua Packwood), in violation of the block placed on him for his offenses. Trilemma (talk) 01:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * And add ✅ and, and  .  Sam Korn (smoddy) 22:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''