Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dacodava

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Dacodava



 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: block log
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: block log
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: block log
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: block log

Dacodava was originally banned on December 19, 2005. The ban was an extension of a one-month block for "having previously made deaththreats", "insults and virulently anti-semitic comments." He has continued to edit Wikipedia under his IP range and numerous socks. His IP range is 82.77.7.xxx, and can be seen at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dacodava.

Adrianzax got into a conflict with two users on Corneliu Zelea Codreanu in January 2008. Although it is quite obvious from looking at the edit history and talk pages of this article that he has used sockpuppets (Feierabend, Bacovia), it became even more apparent that this was Dacodava when corrected the spelling of Bacovia's comment. The behavior of these users, and especially these IPs matches everyone in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dacodava. Khoikhoi 22:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Lol when this abuses will stop? another checkuser for me ?It's quite obvius that i'm Feieraband and Bacovia? where did you got that from? How is so obvious that ip is mine? do you tought maybe that this guy with the 82 ip is the same with the others but not the same with me? what supporting evidences do you have that we're the same ? did you tought maybe there are other people sharing same view as me? This is my only account check me if you want but this is already too much .... my ip begins with 84 not 82  !  Adrianzax (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I looked in the history of this Khoikhoi guy and it seems he edited many times on user Dahn page . Example and Dahn ABUSIVELY raported me yesterday for noticeboard incidents HERE
 * Why abusively ? because his report was rejected and this is the answer he gets ! : "This looks like a content dispute and doesn't belong here. Please take it to a third opinion or, preferably, seek consensus on the article's talk page " I rest my case . Adrianzax (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * - answering this case per SSP evidence and I feel this needs an answer here




 * ❌ - the rest, without commenting on the IP address as it is unwarranted here, I feel - A l is o n  ❤ 05:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''