Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Danteferno

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Danteferno


Explanation of request for CheckUser. Leyasu 00:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Danteferno previously engaged in confrontations, using unsourced claims of sock puppets against people. Dante has also challenged editors on the Gothic Metal article several times, invoking a consensus 3 times that was against himm, accusing everyone involved except for one admin of Sock Puppet use that was later proved wrong with Check User. Since then the anoymonous user has cropped up again supporting Dante's supposed revision of the Gothic Metal article (even though RFC, admins, and other editors have disagreed 3 times), and is threatening to get involved in a Arbirition case involving Dante and Myself.

As such, i would like the sudden appearance of this user to be checked, to see wether its a sock puppet of Danteferno's, or, wether the user's actions have any legibility to them. Leyasu 00:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The two users are unconnected; in fact, they are in different nations. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much, thats all i wanted to know given reason above. Do i just delete this now? as ive never requested a check user before. Leyasu 10:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * You can delete it now if you wish. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 12:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

, and
User Deathrocker has recently been banned for one month afte a grand total of 70 policy violations in 3 days. Danteferno has been placed under Arbcom Parole, and has been known to use sockpuppets to violate his bans.

The reason for this suspicion is that neither of the users have ever appeared to edit at the same time, when one is around, the other has seemingly dissapeared. When one however gets banned, the other reappears until they are banned, which mystically is when the other reappears again.

Apart from this, both users also have violated the policys, and made the same grandiose claims, featuring such things as the boasting that policys dont apply to them, sources/citations only count if they agree, that only their POV is allowed on articles, and other Wikipedians have to have their express permission to edit articles.

This isnt the only similarities however, both users have edited the same articles, and both make claims that users have done things in relation to them, which happened to the other. This mostly happens when Wikilawyering, with Danteferno claiming incidents that happened with Deathrocker has being against him, and Deathrocker making claims that he posted x comments, when it was Dantferno who has posted them.

These two users have been recognised by both the Abbirition Committe, the ANI, the Mediation Committe, various Admins, the Wikiproject Metal and many other Wikipedians, as serially deconstructive users who have little to no intrest in editing in good faith. This is also confirmed with both users threatening and carrying out the use of Sockpuppets to disrupt and vandalise Wikipedia articles and policy pages when bans are given for their policy violations.

As such, it has become of note to find out if this is two users working together to disrupt Wikipedia, or wether it is one user using multiple accounts in violation of WP:SOCK. Ley Shade 02:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * None of the information above from User:Leyasu is true; User:Leyasu has been in countless edit/flame wars with various Wikipedia editors since November 2005 (See his block history : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:Leyasu) and is currently on Probation, Wikipedia Revert Parole and Wikipedia Personal Attack Parole after an ArbCase involving him and I - sanctions which he has profusely violated.


 * His latest attempt to accuse me of sockpuppetry is absolutely ludicrous. I have no other names on Wikipedia, nor do I need any. Ironically, User:Leyasu evaded a 3RR block using IP addresses 81.157.88.186 & 81.157.93.18 User:Leyasu made edits using "81.157.93.18" in his own journal, further showing proof of an IP WP:SOCK..--Danteferno 04:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

This has just proven my point, as the ip adress where only associated with me by Deathrocker after admin Sceptre has banned Deathrocker for one month. The anons where also confirmed to only be using the same ISP as me, not to actually be related to me. This shows further evidence of exactly what i have aaid.

Other things that are typical of either is the 'X person said is not true', which is a format both have used extensivly, as noted on this evidence page for the abbiration case against Deathrocker, which is on the basis of the same things Danteferno was found guilty of.

This check serves two purposes, firstly to close the investigation into Danteferno and Deathrockers seemingly close association, and claims that they both repeat when they apparantly have no association with each other, like the above. And also if it is found that they are the same person, to be included directly into the evidence of the Deathrocker abbirition case, and also for the abbirition committe to decide what to do about the Danteferno name as well. Ley Shade 13:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Inconclusive. Essjay  Talk •  Contact 16:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''