Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dc76

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Dc76




Please somebody stop User:Dc76, aka User:Bonaparte, aka User:William Pedros at French Wikipedia ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:William_Pedros ), aka newly registered User:Ungurul. I can't even work on the article Balti steppe (translating and editing, as well as adding pics) as the article is being deleted every other 2 minutes...--Moldopodo (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo
 * I'm not a new registred, I'm from 2006, older than you. I suggest you stop attacking the others or you'll get banned soon. Ungurul (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Please check the relationship of the following user accounts and I.P.s respectively used: User:Dc76, User:Suchwings1, User:Constantzeanu, User:Moldorubo, User:Nergaal, User:Bonaparte Userd Dc76 insults me on the Balti talk page (Dc76 namely refers in my regard to unsupported claims of ethnic "hatred", "racism", has a very vulgar and aggressive manner of answering, not providing the proper source, making unilaterally decided edits, violating 3-revert rule (counting reverts and pointing me the number of edits done. Please see the history of Bălţi edits, Bălţi discussion page, User talk:Moldopodo, deleting Russian names of districts, adding diacritics whereas an English established word Balti exists without diacritics for the city in Moldova (according to the Britannica Encyclopedia), deleting references to Balti steppe, whereas again, it is a world known scientifically confirmes reality, Dc76 also edited respectively the article on Geography of Moldova to insert ehre the imagined by him or her theory on inexistence of Balti steppe (ridiculous, just google Balti steppe or rather Beltsy steppe).

Every time a new user (while checking his edit history) seems to interest with something else (firsr edits) in the beginning, little later inevitably he or she becomes "expert" in the Moldavian city of Balti, and namely on the same issues as Dc76, namely when Dc76 is approaching 3revert limit, appears a new puppet, editing exact same places, answering in exact same aggressive and vulgar manner...

What else to say, Dc76 swears to be ready to scan and send her his ID card to sysop to prove the "innocence". However, I know that User Dc76 also plays with IP addresses, because we also had unregistered users from Tanzania and Poland doing occasionally exact same edits in exact same places as Dc76. So it might be a rather difficult task.

Thank you very much in advance --Moldopodo (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo


 * * Code letter: G

User:Dc76 is on dispute with me namely on the question of four official languages in Moldova and on the name of the Moldavian language, to which Dc76 keeps adding Romanian. After violation from my and Dc76's side of the 3-revert rule on the Balti talk page, exatly the same edits where done by the following users: User:212.182.118.70, User:196.46.109.216 and User:Moldorubo. Today, the same story happened on the Moldova page (and is probably going to happen on Moldavian language page soon). User Moldorubo was created today, but shows a surprising level of proficiency in Wikipedia, (he even already made a report on me for violation of 3-revert rule) and kept User:Moldorubo undoing all my edits everywhere, namely on the Balti (city) page. It's her/his first day on Wikipedia and he/she changed only those exact edits, where User:Dc76 was on dispute with me. Moldorubo at the same time actively "defends" User:Anittas (Moldova page), whereas the latter was silent since, just as Dc76 him/herself was silent since the litigation started and most users indicated on the Balti talk page that Dc76 was wrong. User:212.182.118.70 (all of its edits were undid immediatemy after and this user never came back to them, edits limited to chenge of one letter or deleting plural and replacing by singular), User:196.46.109.216 edited surprisingly only the disputed with Dc76 issues and vandalised one other page to create an impression that not only Balti/Moldova topic interests it, User:Moldorubo (created today probably in response to my name Moldopodo and to avoid 3-revert rule, as other anonymous users), User:Anittas, and User:Dc76. I do not have more information to give you as far as my suspicions are concerned, but I would appreciate if you can check who really stands behind all these nicknames. Besides he/she insulted me more than once during the day already on my talk page, as well as on the talk page of Moldova article, and on other pages of Wikipedia. I wonder why no NPA policy was applied to hem/her yet? Also have a look at Moldorubo's talk page, where he/she refers to me. User:Anittas has deleted my answer to him/her on User:Anittas talk page, also the phrase where Moldorubo insults me, just like User:Dc76 used to do on Balti talk page, piling up my comments at the end of Dc76's, so that they would be detached from the actual phrase, leaving them (my comments) senseless, or modifying the names of the Section titles written by me. Moldopodo 21:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Moldopodo




 * Code letter: E

User:Tones_benefit account registered on 27 June 2007. Tried to evade 3rr on Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina, history.
 * Reverts by Dc76 (Eastern European time, GMT+2):
 * 1) 15:01, 29.06.2007,
 * 2) 22:14, 29.06.2007,
 * 3) 01:30, 30.06.2007
 * reverts by suspected sock:
 * 1) 22:45, 29.06.2007,
 * 2) 22:49, 29.06.2007,
 * 3) 12:06, 30.06.2007.

So if Tones_benefit is a sock, Dc76 reverted 6 times in about 21 hours. User:Tones_benefit has a very similar editing style and seems to know a lot about editing wikipedia for someone who joined less than a week ago. Other editors also expressed their concern, see here.Anonimu 11:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * ❌. No IP relationship detected. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''