Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DiabloSE30

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

DiabloSE30



 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.
 * G: Doesn't fit any category, but I believe that it warrents Checkuser.

THis user started to make edits to the Lamborghini Diablo page. He added a fair use image and removed the image of a Diablo GT, along with many other good faith edits. Anyways, I put back the image that he removed and put back a free Diablo image in place of the fair use one. User then precedes to troll the talk page of the Diablo page claiming that I shouldn't edit the article because I am just posting poor quality images and adding false info. and conicidentially, suddenly this account and IPs deciede to put on an all out assault on my userpage, around the same time. So, I am wondering if these events are linked. I an wondering if this user and these IPs were used by this guy. or, maybe he is totally innocent and him on teh Diablo page and the assault on my userpage are two seperate incidents. iI just want to be sure, and if at least the account (which was an attack account) is the same as him, toen for he to be blocked indef. Anyways, I just want to see at least of this guy is responsible for the attack account listed, IPs optional. Karrmann 05:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: I've commented on the standing case at Suspected sock puppets. All indications from the information available to muggles is that these are indeed a group of sockpuppets. Yechiel Man  02:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

✅. 66.25.159.72 = Rockinar.  Voice -of- All  02:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''