Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dodgechris

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Dodgechris (7th)



 * Code letter: F

As alluded to previously, Dodgechris =. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence: The IP follows Dodgechris's general editing pattern of sticking mainly to Coronation Street articles, as well as the occasional edit to articles related to Leicester, the county Dodgechris claimed to come from . Attempted to have myself and User:Gungadin blocked for pointing out the obvious nature of his sockpuppetry . The account Jackalhunter is even more obvious - here again he edits Coronation Street and Horrid Henry articles, Dodgechris's other favourite haunt, and admits on his User page to being called Chris, and attending Dodgechris's school, Market Bosworth High School . Frickative  20:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ is Jackalhunter. The following are all Dodgechris socks:
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)
 * 1) (WJH1992 sock)

Dodgechris (6th)



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Following Dodgechris's usual pattern of making nuisance edits to Coronation Street articles, for instance creating the utterly useless Linda (Coronation Street). Also made this edit to Market Bosworth High School, where Dodgechris claimed to attend, about a pupil named Jarvis, the name used for several of Dodgechris's sock accounts. Furthermore confesses on the user-page to being a 'reformed wiki vandal'.  Frickative  21:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

✅ - the following accounts as Dodgechris socks:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 22:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged and a few articles deleted. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris (5th)



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: All follow Dodgechris's usual editing pattern of making nuisance edits to Coronation Street related articles. I tagged Andrius Babylon as a possible sock, after which the account became inactive, and User:HH124 carried on the same editing dispute . This user has been confirmed as a sock of Dodgechris and blocked. After this account was blocked, the IP became active making the same sort of edits, and after a few days, that too was discarded with the User:Cedunited account stepping in, again with the same sort of contributions that Dodgechris tends towards. Frickative  19:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅, including the IP, noted here per policy and per the egregious nature of this sockpuppeteering - A l is o n  ❤ 00:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris (4th)

 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: A two day gap this time since Dodgechris's last sock account was blocked, and there's a new IP jumping straight in to the exact same articles with the exact same contributions. I'd be astounded if it wasn't him. Frickative  15:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I checked a large number of the accounts listed below looking for a correlation to this new IP. Dodgechris and the IP are to be related (I'd welcome a double check from another CU). There is an apparently innocent user on that IP, so block on behaviour if you must, but please do not disallow logged in editing. I took no action myself. ++Lar: t/c 00:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris (3rd)



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Began editing today, having had two new sock accounts blocked yesterday. Same type of contributions - random merges etc, to all of Dodgchris's old haunts - Coronation Street articles, The Simpsons, Primeval, as well as admitting on his userpage to being from Leicestershire, as was Dodgechris. Frickative  20:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - also -  A l is o n  ❤ 20:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked & tagged, this guy is really starting to get annoying. Tiptoety  talk 20:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Another brand new account diving straight in to merging Coronation Street articles, and as the username suggests, again from the same geographic region of the UK. Frickative  15:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ again. I'm blocking the account and also blocking the IP (AO/ACB) - A l is o n  ❤ 00:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked & tagged. Tiptoety  talk 00:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoa! Beat me to the block :) - A l is o n  ❤ 00:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am just that good ;) Tiptoety  talk 00:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris (2nd)



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Bar a single edit beforehand, contribs show that IP user became heavily active the day after the banning of User:Notdoppler, a confirmed sock of Dodgechris . Contribution history also shows that IP account solely edits Coronation Street articles - also the overwhelming focus of all the other Dodgechris sock accounts. Active editing time corresponds with the other sock accounts - evenings and weekends only. These are generally low traffic articles that see little editing aside from by the Dodgechris socks, making it obvious whenever he starts up again. Frickative  20:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 22:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * IP  Tiptoety  talk 02:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Less than a day after the IP was blocked, and within a few hours of DodgeChris making plain his intent to carry on socking, new user dives straight in and begins editing a couple of DodgeChris's most heavily edited articles (same type of contributions, too - rearranging of the List of characters from Coronation Street article for no reason, merging character articles to list entries with no discussion...) Yet another sock?  Frickative  22:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 22:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * & tagged. Tiptoety  talk 03:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris

 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Blocked)
 * (Not yet blocked)


 * Code letter:C


 * Supporting evidence: was originaly blocked after a SSP case was filed. He subsiquently posted a unblock request which I reviewed and accepted after Dodgechris had completed second chance. I later received a message on my talk page providing evidence that he was once again using multiple accounts in an abusive manner, and as such I re-blocked the account. It now appears he still has quite a few unblocked accounts including  who has recently began campaigning for the users unblock. I love energy drinks!'s account was created around the same time as that of Dodgechris's and both accounts edit soap opera and television related articles. I would appreciate clearing out this sockfarm seeing as this user is now engaging in personal attacks. As always, thanks.  Tiptoety  talk 00:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * *sigh* - ✅ - socks everywhere. This sock-puppeteer appears to be related to indefblocked editor User:WJH1992 and is constantly being caught in this rangeblock. I recommend extending this rangeblock as it's just due to expire. This guy has been at this for ages. Listing the blocked and unblocked here:




 * - a few that weren't caught in the rangeblock. Possibility of another rangeblock in there, too but see how things go for the moment - A l is o n  ❤ 06:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 12:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This user has just made an account today and appears to be engaging in similar edits to Dodgechris. Would it be possible to check if it's him too please?  GG Moan 15:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The case has been relisted on top of WP:RFCU. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 16:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ❌ - A l is o n  ❤ 18:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Range softblocked for 3 months. Tiptoety  talk 17:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''