Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr. Krischer

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Dr. Krischer



 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D
 * Code letter: C,D

Accounts whose only contributions are to vote on Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas. There's also several additional acconts on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas. I think we can agree that there's at least a meatpuppet issue here. I suppose, given he's the only other person on that page as rabidly pro-Vithoulkas, they might be socks of, but it's more likely they're related to Vithoulkas himself, who originated the article. By the way, I just discovered the whole page that sparked such uproar was a copyvio. Sometimes I hate my life. Adam Cuerden talk 23:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Addendum: User:Homeopathic has entered the debate on the Talk:Homeopathy page. I mention him because judging by Image:George_vithoulkas_smallpicture.jpg, which he uploaded, and given the copyright tag, he must be closely related to the subject of the AfD. Adam Cuerden talk 18:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merged User:Homeopathic with case. Real96 01:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Addendum #2: I've added a letter C, as it was pointed out to me that User:213.5.44.117 was playing multiple roles at Talk:Homeopathy in order to attack me:  

There's only really two regular users I could see this being: , who was the first to complain loudly about my suggestion to delete Vithoulkas, but seemed to have calmed down, and hasn't been seen for a bit, and, who as I discovered when looking at his contributions, is either George Vithoulkas or related to him (or lied on the copyright tag of Image:George_vithoulkas_smallpicture.jpg).

That said, at least some of these are likely to be meatpuppets, canvassed from Homeopathic forums:  Adam Cuerden talk 06:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Not the deciding vote. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''