Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/EBDCM

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

EBDCM



 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence: IP:        User:
 * Supporting evidence: IP:        User:

Continuing to reinsert contentious material in Chiropractic. The user was previously blocked for editing warring, although not specifically 3RR. I can't find any evidence that the user had previously used that IP address. When I mentioned the possibility that he used the IP, he responded with a legal threat, so I thought I'm come here for a more definite response. &mdash; Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I object to this gross mischaracterization, I did not use the IP address in question nor was I engaged in an edit war. There is NO evidence WHATSOEVER  that I have used an anon (besides my 208 IP which is due to a time out isssue) and this appears to be nothing more than an attempt to smear a good contributor.  I am frequently being attacked by anon users and the anti-chiropractic users and this is just another example of that.  EBDCM (talk) 13:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think DoctorIsIn is the IP, but if EBDCM does, he should add it to the request. You DID revert the same material twice after the IP stopped.  Also, this is more behavioural than a matter for checkuser, but the IP and EBDCM have the same variant of the standard indenting style on talk pages, adding 2 to 3 more colons than the section they are responding to, rather than the standard 1 additional colon.  I doubt it's an intentional affectation.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin  (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Indentation is the "evidence" that you're providing. Wow. Talk about reaching for a point. Regardless, the evidence is clearly there for all to see. Also, it should be noted that you're using a checkuser request for a supposed behaviour problem. I have engaged with you civilly, and have politely asked you for an apology which I have yet to receive. Also, I am not suggesting that DoctorIsIn is the IP; I merely stated that he reverted your edit as well and I agreed with his reversion. EBDCM (talk) 14:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

, unless EBDCM wishes to grant permission to release the data. The privacy policy is a harsh mistress. Otherwise, the duck test usually works. Thatcher 15:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * After consulting with other checkusers on the privacy policy, I believe I can answer . The IP in question is on the same /24 as an IP that EBDCM has used in the past. Thatcher 17:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''