Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ed Poor

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Ed Poor
Serious edit war at Intelligent design between User:Ed Poor and the remaining editors, resulting in full protection of the page, 3RR violation report filed against Ed Poor and RFC filed against Ed Poor. Just after this all had started, User:LenW reinserted the last statement of Ed Poor, which was not a simple revert an other edit had taklen place to correct grammar errors. Consequently, the suggestion of sockpuppetry has been brougt forward, and it might need to be established beyond doubt. Of course, this could be a coincidence and if this is insufficient for a checkuser, I understand. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 23:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

❌ I generally do not run checkusers on highly established users without strong evidence, but as I see potential for this to escalate, I went ahead and ran it. The two do not appear to be related at all (separate countries). Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  19:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, this sets some issues aside that otherwise would be linguring, but I would have understand if it you had not done it. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 00:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''