Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/EdwardLeeFrampton

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

EdwardLeeFrampton



 * Code letter: G

These users and IPs all show the same patterns on the same articles (primarily English Qabalah and New Aeon English Qabala), IP address seem to be widely varied (open proxies?):
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Removal or moving of deletion templates:, , , ,
 * Removal of the same talk page comments:, , , ,

Please let me know if more evidence is needed. QaBobAllah (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

ELF also adds spam about a book, he acts as if the book is important but I'm not sure if it's even out yet...aah I see it supposedly came out in July but it seems to be published by a press with which the author is associated. He adds large chunks of info/charts from this book to the article English Qabalah and New Aeon English Qabalah. AleisterCrowley222 does the same  (no one else will know about this book, and ELF originally created the EQ article seemingly to promote a book by a Mr.Vincent, although it's become more well rounded since then.)  The IPs removed tags which said the article contained spam etc for this book. To me this says that Ed, Al, and the Ips QaBob mentions above are the same person, here to promote a book. Sticky Parkin 01:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the following accounts as being the same editor -  A l is o n  ❤ 19:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ❌ - the following:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 19:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * All confirmed accounts indef blocked & tagged. Also, Alison, any comment in relation to the IP's? Tiptoety  talk 19:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ummm - I was going to let them slide but given the nature of the disruption, ✅ also - A l is o n  ❤ 19:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, seeing as they have all been active within the past week if not the last few days I went ahead and softblocked all of them for one month. Tiptoety  talk 19:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''