Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eichikiyama

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Eichikiyama
The anon and Eichikiyama have been persistently disrupting Wikipedia as blanking of properly cited information supported by academic sources. I have seen same behaviors including same writing habit like being written (at all), Therefore, or Please concretely by indef.blocked user,  just like Eichikiyama as we as the anons's comment. The past RFCU on him would be too old to check, but you can confirm on whether the disruptive ip user is Eichikiyama's log-out socks. He is also using the I and living in Tokyo, Japan. These users have a great interest in manga, traditional culture of Japan, cuisine, history of Japan, especially, relation between the early period of Japan and Korea like Kofun period and history in late 19th and early 20th century. The users share the same habit of banking only Korean related mention regardless such materials are sourced. Instead, they replace them with primary sources and wrong translation. On History of Japan, Eichikiyama also blanked the same content as the anon did Admin, Ryulong warned Eichikiyama for the reason too. As for Windybluesea, he appeared to edit History of Japan to support the anon's blanking, as well as to edit Kofun and Kumdo articles with the same agenda and deceptive edit summaries where many 2channe sock/meat appeared too. For the same writing stye, and same interest, and I information, I believe the anon, Eichikiyama and Azukimonaka are the same disruptive troll who should not be allowed to edit Wikipedia. Azukimonaka was abusing socks, so there would be more accounts. --Caspian blue 23:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * all Japanese ODN user
 * = Eichikiyama, ODN user
 * = likely Eichikiyama given his previous and subsequent edits on the articleThe source is being written
 * all Japanese ODN user
 * = Eichikiyama, ODN user
 * = likely Eichikiyama given his previous and subsequent edits on the articleThe source is being written
 * = Eichikiyama, ODN user
 * = likely Eichikiyama given his previous and subsequent edits on the articleThe source is being written
 * = Eichikiyama, ODN user
 * = likely Eichikiyama given his previous and subsequent edits on the articleThe source is being written
 * = likely Eichikiyama given his previous and subsequent edits on the articleThe source is being written
 * Code letter: C, F
 * '''Supporting evidence:
 * Suspected sock puppets/Azukimonaka
 * Suspected sock puppets/Eichikiyama
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Pabopa
 * User_talk:Eichikiyama
 * is . ✅ =  =  = . Based on the list of IP socks at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Azukimonaka, I'd say that they're ✅ as Azukimonaka. I've instituted some rangeblocks to prevent him from socking as anons. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Request Can you also check ? After I checked responses at a RFC on Talk:Lee Myung-bak, I visited 's page to give the user the welcoming banner Welcome WPKorea because s/he seems like be interested in Korean subjects. I found the page is empty, so checked the history just for curiosity. Funnily, a seemingly Korean named editor (but very weird and unusual name even in Korea), accused Pds0101 of being my sockpuppeter. (lol) I checked the accuser's registered date which is just two days ago and his only edits are accusing  and  as such, but all of which have no contribution history. The vandal also created this category. I think the two accounts are socks that Kimbakmong created to falsely accuses me.


 * I also believe this is either this Japanese ODN IP user's retaliation after my attaching to a sock template on her/his dynamic IP age or past RFCUs that I have filed. Or other sockpuppeters who were blocked by my reports or editors in dispute with me in the past. Therefore, I request an indefinite block and checkuser on the vandal and deletion of what the vandal has done. Thanks.--Caspian blue 01:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * that Kimbakmong = the sockpuppets I previously listed. All pages deleted. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 02:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * Thanks, but the sock accounts are not blocked yet. Maybe clerks would take care of the blocking later? And is there any possibility for the sockpuppeter to have more socks? suddenly appeared to support for the sockpuppeter, is the I related to him?--Caspian blue 20:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)