Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ekajati

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Ekajati



 * Code letter: F

This user registered for an account 24th September 2008 and has, since then, made 1432 edits which demonstrate prior knowledge of how Wikipedia works (cats, templating users, noticeboards, CSDs, and a range of complex policies including WP:BLP). Fair enough, but the focus of these edits (occult articles) are the very same as all these individuals who, it turned out, weren't in the plural after all. I think this is may be another attempt by User:Ekajati to evade the community ban. Coldmachine Talk 16:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Renamed page after Ekajati. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is insufficient evidence of evasion. -- Avi (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: this was confirmed by another checkuser, and the account has been blocked. Coldmachine Talk 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: User:Wednesday Next also found to be in the pile. Coldmachine Talk 07:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

So is this considered to be a declined or completed case? Avi declined it but YellowMonkey looks like he ran a check and blocked 2. OhanaUnitedTalk page 13:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ per comparision with archived results.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to choose Australia's next top model ) 03:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as it is officially decline, move it to declined requests. (I have done so). Tiptoety talk 14:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, moving to completed now that YellowMonkey confirmed the findings. OhanaUnitedTalk page 11:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''