Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Elaich

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Elaich



 * Code letter: G

Elaich has nominated three pages for AFD Ed (Ed, Edd n Eddy), Edd (Ed, Edd n Eddy), Eddy (Ed, Edd n Eddy).

02:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC): Elaich posts a comment on Squirepants101's page informing him to vote delete on the three nominated AFD articles.  02:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC): 71.138.27.12 posts the exact same comment on my page only seven minutes later. 

On the three nominated pages, both 71.138.27.12 and Squirepants101 posted that the pages should be deleted. A very similar comment came from another IP address 172.190.29.107, who has only made six edits, four towards the deletion of the articles.

My nickname for this person is the 'IP Guy'. He claimed to have a registered account but doesn't like to log in. He heavlly protects the Ed, Edd n Eddy from vandalism and cruft, to read about more that he has done look here. . As it states, he has Linux so his IP address changes from time to time, he originally used this to his advantage three or four times to evade a block. The reason he was blocked was because he was fighting with another user who provided sources for a part of the article, but the 'IP Guy' kept on saying it was vandalism, and eventaully they both broke the 3RR, making them banned. Read about it here   I'm thinking he's doing this again just to get his way like last time. DietLimeCola 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * fixed AfD links -- lucasbfr talk 07:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


 * DietLimeCola, I just commented on the AFDs. I did not state whether the article should be deleted or kept. Squirepants101 11:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I know DietLimeCola 13:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

. Where is the sockpuppet abuse? Dmcdevit·t 04:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''