Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Endgame1

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Eptypes


Confirmed here and here. Thatcher131 18:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Endgame1





 * Code letter: F

Ended up leaving the last one alone, as he seemed to be making an effort at productivity and his behavior wasn't noticeably worse than any other kid with more time and enthusiasm than anything else. But here's another one with a very similar pattern of activities, and this guy's had the 'one account to a customer' thing explained to him multiple times in various guises. Opabinia regalis 00:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Per F, could you please list a diff of the discussion that resulted in the ban or block of the user? Real96 02:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, you mean the guy that's been checkusered twice now? The original was an ordinary vandal/sock block (Endgame's block log), but he would've been indef'd on his own accord as User:Records if he hadn't admitted to socking here. Opabinia regalis 03:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

No recent edits. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Endgame1





 * Code letter: F

Admitted pure hunch, but there are behavioral similarities to the previous socks listed below, including disruption on his own RfA (Requests for adminship/Parker007), peculiar interest in the WP:MCB collaborations, strange FA nominations, and non sequitur reference desk questions. Parker's first edits were two days after Foundby was blocked. Opabinia regalis 02:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Mackensen --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 19:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

. Mackensen (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Endgame1





 * Code letter: F

Endgame1, Records, Weaken, and the IP are all known to be the same indefblocked user; the question is whether User:Foundby is related; Foundby shares many of Records' disruptive behaviors but to a somewhat lesser extent. Both Foundby and Records submitted a blatantly premature FAC nomination for Folding@Home, then spammed talk pages of the objectors with requests for rereviews and sofixits (eg F:, R:  ) without actually doing significant work on the article. Foundby also attempted to spam talk pages by adding a series of users one or two at a time to to the SuggestBot list. Foundby's first edit ever was a reference desk question regarding the outcome of the previous F@H nomination:. Foundby and Records also share formatting quirks such as excessive bolding. Note also that Foundby has a malformatted, doomed RfA up at Requests_for_adminship/Foundby, and Endgame1 had a history of oddball/trolling RfA comments, including his first edit. Opabinia regalis 08:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC) ✅ that Foundby is a sockpuppet of Endgame1. These accounts as well: --Mackensen (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also notice that User:Foundby signed up on December 9, 2006, coincidentally 5 days after User:Records was indefinitely blocked (December 4, 2006) for sockpuppetry. Also, they share similar edit patterns (for example, both have a huge history of edits on List of billionaires (2006), and like to shuffle around their user talk page edits). See also Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Endgame1. AZ t 22:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''