Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ericsaindon2

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Ericsaindon2


Code letter: B (see Requests for arbitration/Ericsaindon2)

Ericsaindon2 is under a one-year ban for disruptive editing at. His previously ID'd socks are too old to check, but typical edits were made recently from his trademark IP range 69.232.0.0/16 (Pacbell dsl numbers) as shown above. Architect King is editing from the same POV, and one of his first edits to the article was to explain how Ericsaindon2 was right all along. It may be a pointless check, since Architect King claims to be in Southern California anyway, bit I'd like to at least try the check before dropping a sock block on him. Thatcher131 00:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ✅ Dmcdevit·t 02:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Mr.Executive


I request that a checkuser be done on myself (I am Ericsaindon2). I was involved in a conflict with a user about a month ago (user:Coolcaesar). Another uninvolved user (user:Mr.Executive) began seeing signs of trouble with the user I had been arguing with for nearly a month, and Coolcaesar made a personal attack at him. Well, he filed an ArbCom case against Coolcaesar for there were well over 200 pieces of evidence against him. Since then, he (Mr.Executive) has been treated like my Sockpuppet and was blocked indefinately for a purely speculative case. They have no proof that this is my sockpuppet, and just blocked the user indefinately out of a curious suspicion (because, you know it is impossible for two completely different editors to be angry at the same editor, especially after that editor made personal attacks at 110 different Wikipedians in 2 years). The abusive admin would not let user:Mr.Executive even remove the sockpuppet tags from his page banning him from even defending himself. I want his name cleared for this abusive admin needs to see that we are two different people very mad at the same person. I would ask that all the tags be lifted from his page, and the block be lifted if it comes back false, as well as an apology from user:Will Beback and user:SCEhardt for the suffering they caused to this user for just a curiosity. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.36.69 (talk • contribs), also appears to be
 * Note: People requesting checkusers on themselves normally have their requests declined. --Lord Deskana (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I know, but I am tired of everyone being called the sockpuppet of mine just because they support me in what I am doing. I have no way out, I am stuck with abusive admins, and one editor who did nothing wrong who I feel so sorry for who was accused of being my sockpuppet, and is not, but was banned indefinately for absolutely nothing. user:Mr.Executive does not deserve any of this, and is stuck between two abusive admins, and finds no way out. I find that anyone who agrees with me is banned with me, and I dont want this user to be treated that way. I NEED you to accept this for I am in a difficult predicament, and have found no way out. He did NOTHING wrong except disagree with another personal attacker (Coolcaesar) and is paying the price. It is wrong, and it is not a want at this point, it is virually a need and I am begging you to free this user who is being treated so misfortunately.


 * Per RFCU policy #5, this is the subject of an open arbitration preceeding, at Requests_for_arbitration/Ericsaindon2, requests should be made there. Kevin_b_er 22:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Mackensen (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Ericsaindon2


I just found out about the CheckUser feature. I request any user with the CheckUser privilege to analyze the IP addresses of OC31113 and Ericsaindon2. Because the two users' have highly similar writing styles and interests, it appears that OC31113 is a sockpuppet of Ericsaindon2, but it would be nice to have evidence of identical IP addresses as additional evidence in this case. --Coolcaesar [ 16:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)]
 * Requests for Arbitration pending case


 * Using checkuser I have confirmed that the two accounts used the same ip part of the time. Fred Bauder [ 12:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)]


 * This is an archive of a request for the use of checkuser not made through WP:RFCU. Diffs of the original request are linked to the timestamps. Text is taken verbatum and the full context of the request is visible as of when the checkuser administrator replied is [ here]. Kevin_b_er 06:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''