Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Forestfarmer

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Forestfarmer




All seem to be working in concert to avoid 3RR on various Japan-Korea related articles. One will revert three times, then another will pick up, and so on. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  02:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)




 * 100doors has been at Norimitsu Onishi where Mythologia and Objectman have also frequented. Junmai likes to revert at Rusk documents and Dokdo where the other socks like to hang out.  Dent2000q likes to hang out at Rusk and Dokdo as well.  And like above, they have basically new accounts with less than 100 edits, a gap period of inactivity correlating to when Objectman was banned, edits and reverts the same materials as the other suspected socks, and seems to be working to avoid the three revert rule.  Tortfeasor 05:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * , who moved his user page to User:QFJ
 * , who moved his user page to User:QFJ


 * same thing, reverts at same articles, same POV, registered new accounts around same time, same limited english level & wording of comments.


 * many of these had previously been requested for checkuser, please see Requests for checkuser/Case/Objectman. the ongoing problems started around the time of the case, and continues on the same articles by anons and accounts set up around the time of his blocking.


 * the situation with japan-related articles in the last month has gotten so bad many hard-working editors have simply left, and the remaing few are unable to do anything but constantly keep reverting, and some obscure articles have been left for dead. this is especially unfortunate at Japan, which was well on its way to featured status. thanks. Appleby 17:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

This sounds like a content-dispute, which might be better settled at Requests for Comment. Mackensen (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''