Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Foxhunt99

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Foxhunt99



 * Code letter: G


 * Supporting evidence: This user is a single purpose account who has attempted many times to insert a nationalist Chinese POV in Tibet, Serfdom in Tibet and Tenzin Gyatso. Foxhunt99 and his socks have all made edits with similar edit summaries (and POV) to Joseph Smith, Jr. and Mormonism, each trying to insert a negative POV.

Foxhunt99 was blocked for vandalism to Joseph Smith, Jr. on May 13th. Guox0032 registered two hours later and resumed the edit war on Mormonism. Xbox999 was registered 12 hours after that. These are both likely block-evading sockpuppets. All three accounts have similar names and writing styles as well. There may be previous socks employed by this user, but these are the three most active currently. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 00:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Update: new sock added. Style and disposition here are identical to that of the other two sockpuppets. Registered yesterday afternoon with 6 edits and is already parroting back arguments presented by Foxhunt99 on that talk page and the talk page for Tibet. Pretty clear evidence this is another sockpuppet. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 19:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * you might wish to include more evidence diffs (I see none of Xbox999) -- lucasbfr  talk 08:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I didn't include those because they are entirely contained with Serfdom in Tibet (which Foxhunt99 created) and every edit they've made has been to promote the idea of the enslavement of the Tibetan people, something which Foxhunt99 proudly promotes. Here are a few as an example of what I mean:   Cumulus Clouds (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

And here they both are supporting each other in their fight to get slavery figures listed in the article and claiming a refusal to do so is narrow minded and racist. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * And it seems you are carrying the banner for slavery or serfdom didn't exist in Tibet by editing out every part, even properly cited evidence to show serfdom or slavery existed? For every POV tag I put in, I started a discussion, unlike you.

When I started a dicussion this is your response "Your bias is pretty obvious here so I don't think anybody has any real interested in trying to indulge your request to insert POV into this article." Instead of providing some arguments, you started with personal attack. But you have edited it out, but we can still see it. Foxhunt99 (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

People already pointed out that it is anywhere from 20-90% of Tibetan people were serfs, It is also said there is no data to prove or disprove. How can you claim this to not be NPOV. The whole idea of Serf in Tibet is to show that serfdom and slavery existed, nothing more and nothing less. If you a mod is looking at this please see what Cumulus Clouds has edited. He never started any discussion on Serfdom in Tibet, he edited out parts only to show harsh serfdom, and left the part to show mild serfdom. Foxhunt99 (talk) 15:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This is less about the point your trying to prove and more about the means you've employed to make it. That those accounts have been used to insert unique and unusual POVs into a variety of different articles is strong evidence that they are linked. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The talk page for Serfdom in Tibet contains a number of comments from anonymous IPs who defend Foxhunt99 and Guox0032 when their edits are called into question. These IPs are all traced back to Vanderbilt University, which also edited this page earlier, but whose signature was replaced by Foxhunt99. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Guox0032 inserted this material claiming that the Dalai Lama owned slaves. It was reverted three times and then reinserted by an anonymous IP which traces to Nasvhille, Tennessee (where Vanderbilt is located). This same IP later reinserted material written by Guox0032 at Serfdom in Tibet after it was removed for being highly POV. This material was then readded by Foxhunt99. This IP has commented frequently supporting Foxhunt99 and espouses the same nationalist POV. This is strong evidence that it's the same person making all of these edits and they should be blocked for abusive sockpuppetry. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, they are millions of people in Nashville, majority of people who work in education department are at Vanderbilt.  I asked if dalai lama owned slaves in discussion, but people removed it 3 times, then I gave up, because they don't want to believe in sources.  I never said dalai lama owned slaves in Serfdom in Tibet did I?  In fact there are other editor who added more neutral point into the article you are claiming to be me.  Xbox999 added that serfdom and slavery can be mild too, which don't agree at all. But I agree it is part of NPOV and should be presented.  On the other hand, you are deleting parts I don't even know why you are trying to delete, some parts that Xbox999 inserted even supported your viewpoint.  Do you really believe that slavery didn't exist in Old Tibet? Only one is doing vandalism is you by deleting without proper reason and refusing to let other people provide a NPOV.Foxhunt99 (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I doubt there are so many people in Nashville who agree with virtually every point you're making and would go as far as expounding their agreement so frequently on an online encyclopedia. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * we have a large community here, plus I am sure several of my classmates share the same viewpoint as mine. Foxhunt99 (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll bet. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Plus my view point is clearly stated with sources, you are free to express your point of view, but instead you choose personal attack and deletion without giving proper reason. Foxhunt99 (talk) 18:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * that Foxhunt99, Xbox999 are the same editor. Guox0032 is in the same city on a different ISP, so .   Easymem is ❌. Thatcher 00:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * yet, you followed my editing in other pages, and claimed I was sock puppet, I demand an admin do something about this. Easymem (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''