Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fraberj

Fraberj



 * F:


 * Supporting evidence:The talk page of the user and the contributions. The style of editing and pages edited are exactly the same as the sockmaster.—  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 09:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Fraberj



 * F:


 * Supporting evidence:I am requesting this CU due to recent activity regarding the articles the banned user has edited and other involved editors.


 * The second edit of user GeraldDean, supporting a request for taking of the semi-protection of an article where the conflict has ocurred.
 * Same editor agreeing with the rant of another editor regaring the editors involved in the dispute, and the articles involved in the dispute.
 * Independent2's first edit, asking that the admins revert the editor SteveBaker, who the banned user had previously had a conflict with.
 * A long rant by Independent2 regarding the articles the conflict is about, along with the involved editor SteveBaker.
 * The user Independent2 registered one hour after GeraldDean registered.

—  Dæ dαlusT@lk / Improve Contribs   01:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ GeraldDean and Independent2 are the same user. They are on a different ISP than Fraberj but the geolocations are similar. Thatcher 03:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * - blocked and tagged... Tiptoety  talk 01:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Fraberj



 * F:


 * Supporting evidence: I am requesting this CU due to a point made by another editor upon the second user's talk page, found here. I feel there is nothing to add, as the he makes a pretty good argument.—  Dæ dαlusT@lk / Improve \ Contribs 05:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See also Suspected_sock_puppets/Fraberj (2nd). EdJohnston (talk) 01:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I have been using Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fraberj to maintain the growing list of 71.114.*.* addresses as I track them down through edit history similarities and such. It's clear though that these are being allocated to Fraberj from a DHCP server because they change from one day to the next. As of tonight, the list includes:
 * User:71.114.0.0/16
 * User:71.114.2.92
 * User:71.114.29.238
 * User:71.114.30.158
 * User:71.114.45.254
 * User:71.114.9.27
 * User:71.114.9.82
 * Previous rounds of sock-puppet hunting seem to have turned up a range of 4.249.*.* addresses - but those don't seem to have been active for the past couple of months:
 * User:4.249.198.159
 * User:4.249.48.217
 * User:4.249.48.23
 * User:4.249.51.202
 * User:4.249.51.251
 * User:4.249.75.64
 * User:4.249.78.107
 * SteveBaker (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅. Thatcher 03:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)