Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Frater Xyzzy

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Frater Xyzzy





 * Code letter: N/A; listed as disruption on AN/I per RFCU page, was told to make the request here.

Explanation: As I believe a specific check of a diff is necessary for proof, I will explain as briefly as possible why I believe this is necessary.

Frater Xyzzy was blocked as a sock of Jeffersomn Anderson, but has a contrib where he "returned from Wikibreak" after apparently moving (per his talk page) on Jan. 26 here.

Four days later, the IP 204.122.16.13 makes his first edit: a reversion of Obligations in Freemasonry here, claiming a "single-purpose account". This article was created by Frater Xyzzy.

The IP claims on the talk page of the article in this thread, most of the way down, that it was the stupid corrupt WP administration's fault. This aside, the IP's hostile tone and fixation on the article is too similar to Xyzzy to be an accident. I would like a checkuser on the IP as related to Xyzzy's edit address to the last two edits he made (to his talk page). As those occurred after his relocation, they should match closely to the IP if they are related. As Jefferson Anderson has also popped up on this article for no apparent reason, I want him checked as well as Hanuman Das. They are named as part of Requests_for_arbitration/Starwood, and the IP has knowledge of the users' situation despite a supposed two week editing history. MSJapan 21:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Discussion moved to talk page. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 05:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 06:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * On reconsideration: ❌. Hanuman Das is stale. No IP connection shown between Xyzzy and Jefferson Anderson. Xyzzy has stated that he's the IP. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 07:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''