Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/G.-M. Cupertino

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

G.-M. Cupertino



 * Code letter: E (SEE WP:RFCU)


 * Supporting evidence: Code G may apply. The history of User_talk:Kww shows that it's possible that GMC is also utilizing IP in this case. Editor recently is involved in an RFAR request as well. - Penwhale &#124; Blast him / Follow his steps 15:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know to which extent the case is related to the RfAr, but it might be better to request it on the case itself if they are tied. -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 16:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It was opened as an RfAr case today, but it would be a conflict of interest for me to request it through them as I'm an arbitration clerk, so I'm trying to maintain transparency. - Penwhale &#124; Blast him / Follow his steps 17:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅, also and . I've blocked both accounts as sockpuppets (they were used disruptively a few weeks ago; see Suspected sock puppets/SavetheArchduke) and extended G.-M. Cupertino's block for block evasion under Gonçalo-Manuel. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''