Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Grandmaster

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Grandmaster





 * Code letter: D

I strongly suspect that User:Tabib is a sock-puppet of User:Grandmaster used for vote-stacking, User:Tabib only appearers every now and then, to vote with, and on the same pages as User:Grandmaster. Mardavich 06:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 07:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why declined? I have followed the instructions and provided evidence. Please review again - much appreciated. --Mardavich 08:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Since you and the two named editors are all parties in an clearly to-be-accepted arbitration case, this should be treated as a Question about a possible sock puppet related to an open arbitration case, and your request may be handled as part of the arbitration. However, that wasn't the reason for my declining the case; my reason was based on observation of the parties editing patterns, which do not (to me) fit your descriptions. These are both well-established editors, with thousands of edits each. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If you take another look at the parties' editing patterns, you'll see that User:Tabib's recent edits have all been either double-voting with, or reverting to, User:Grandmaster. I strongly believe that User:Tabib is an old alias of User:Grandmaster, which User:Grandmaster irregularly uses to vote-stack and evade 3RR. --Mardavich 18:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You've provided no evidence of 3RR issues; if you can demonstrate that (providing diffs for sockpuppet-like 3RR violations), there might be cause to run a checkuser. Regardless, the case is going into arbitration; we'll do this, if we do it, in process. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 22:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''