Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Greg Jungwirth

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Greg Jungwirth 3





 * Code letter: ACF
 * Supporting evidence: Requesting check in connection with Suspected sock puppets/Greg Jungwirth (3rd), not looking to find a link as it's clear he's behind both accounts but to find out if the same IP address or /16 range was used by the two most recent accounts made by Jungwirth for purposes of blocking. treelo  radda  02:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Firstly, for some time. Let me know if he returns.


 * ✅ - better make sure all these are blocked, too:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 18:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Greg Jungwirth 2



 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking out this one account, which does not appear abusive. EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)




 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: Requesting check in connection with Suspected sock puppets/Greg Jungwirth (2nd) treelo  talk 23:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

--Thatcher 01:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅, see also Suspected sock puppets/Colective follower:
 * Striking an account that has no evidence of abuse. EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Oops. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't do that. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking an account that has no evidence of abuse. EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Oops. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't do that. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking an account that has no evidence of abuse. EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Oops. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't do that. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking an account that has no evidence of abuse. EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Oops. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't do that. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't do that. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Thatcher, are you confirming all the accounts in the list to be Greg Jungwirth, including Gregory E. Miller and the IPs? EdJohnston (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Gregory E. Miller is included. I'm not formally confirming the IPs but all but one of them are in the same place doing the same thing, so quack. Thatcher 02:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The new accounts listed at the top of this report are all blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 05:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't alter my findings. The account  was clearly created by the "Colective" guy.  If for some reason you don't want to block it, make a note of it here or not, but the technical findings are what they are. Thatcher 10:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I undid the strikeout and blocked the account. All the accounts listed in this report are blocked and tagged as socks of GJ except for 65.29.169.15, which I will keep under observation. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Greg Jungwirth





 * Code letter: C, F
 * Supporting evidence: The accounts named might both be used by the same person given both have threatened me with "making my life hell" . This is in association with a SSP case for the puppeteer.  treelo  talk 18:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * - accepting per SSP evidence


 * and are ❌. However, the following accounts are ✅ as being socks of the latter:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 19:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

GJ already blocked yesteday as vandal only account. I am blocking both socks indef. Tagging all three. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 02:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''