Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HeBhagawan

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

HeBhagawan



 * Code letter: Might be C or E

Article provide wrong connotations. Whenever I tried to add worthy edits, they are removed on one or other pretext. They continue statements without citations or add improper citations leading to book source and not source of the text incorporated but at the same time they remove each and every edit of mine and seek citations for matter of general knowledge. They discourage other editors by incivility. HeBhagawan and Apandey surfaced simultaneously at a time and shot incivil statements. Apandey is hardly seen thenafter. He is no way involved in edits of the article but make incivil comments. The article is self nominated for FAC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swadhyayee (talk • contribs)


 * Diffs of vandalism or 3RR evasion? Dmcdevit·t 22:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * They charge me of vandalism and remove each and every additional details about Hinduism I incorporate. It's in principle wrong, not to allow someone contribute to an article.  To serve the purpose, incivility and sock-puppetry is resorted to.  "Hinduism" is a self nominated for FAC.  Other editors are not allowed to work on the article.  The attitude is not in the interest of subject matter of article or Wikipedia. I wish to get sock-puppetry checked and exposed. Swadhyayee 12:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * . You need to provide me diffs of vandalism of evidence of abusive sockpuppetry for a check. Dmcdevit·t 01:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * With your permission, I provide evidences.
 * This was my first edit []. This is my 2nd edit [].  This is my 3rd edit [].  This is my 4th edit [].  This is my 5th edit []. This is my 6th edit [].  This is my 7th edit [].  This is the message I put on talk page of Hinduism being my 1st message [].  This is what was the response of HeBhagawan to my comments [] [].  This was my reply to HeBhagawan []
 * All these 7 edits were reversed by HeBhagawan [].
 * This is my 8th edit. [].  My intentional edits were line 75 & line 102.  Other edits are accidental may be due to use of pop-up. This was reversed by RamRamji []on the day of his registration i.e. 7th Oct. 06.
 * Request: Edits yet to continue, pl. wait.Swadhyayee 02:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What does this have to do with sockpuppetry? Dmcdevit·t 03:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Applicant notified at 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC).
 * If evidence isn't provided within two days from 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC), when applicant was notified, I am going to move this to declined. G e o. 01:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC) [Edited by DB in relation to time frame]

I shall provide before 10/11/06. Pl. give me time as I am new. I would like to make it brief and to the point and will prefer not to lose for in-sufficient presentation. swadhyayee 08:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I am from India and I have my Chinese business contacts as guests and I shall not be able to present my case on 10th and probably even 11th of Nov. 06. I have also appealed to Daniel.Bryant and Geo to give me more time. An adjournment in the matter is requested for personal difficulties and voluminous nature of evidences. swadhyayee 18:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''