Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Highfructosecornsyrup 2



 * Code letter: B, F, G


 * Supporting evidence:


 * Suspected_sock_puppets/Highfructosecornsyrup
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup
 * User_talk:Cirt
 * User_talk:SunDragon34

We'd like to know if Shrampes is a sock of Wikipediatrix/Highfructosecornsyrup, per the above cases and discussions. Thanks. ~SunDragon34  (talk )   23:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This may also have connections to information from Requests for checkuser/Case/COFS and Requests for arbitration/COFS/Evidence. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Some of this links are to data that is stale for CU - but certainly not all of it, but I think there's sufficient concern here for a CU check.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 17:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

, ,

results on  — Rlevse •  Talk  • 18:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Highfructosecornsyrup





 * Other possible suspects


 * (confirmed sockpuppet of AI)
 * (confirmed sockpuppet of AI)


 * Also possible




 * F: Link to final indefinite ban of Terryeo His RfAr where he was initially banned from all Scientology articles

Per an earlier post by myself and several other concerned editors this user appeared from nowhere and almost immediately began causing all manner of controversy on articles pertaining to Scientology.

His experience on Wikipedia is obvious; He created an article immediately upon regsitering his account, in which he used correct categories, sections, external linking, wikicode, stubbed and used an edit summary and then signed correctly on his first ever talk page edit.

He has knowledge of past disputes, has run numerous RfAs, tagged copyvios and speaks with full knowledge of Wiki policy. Yes denies ever editing before. The above are scientology editors who have been banned, as he is DEFINITELY a sock of someone. The question is who?  Glen 04:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

All of the suspects you listed, with the possible exception of Terryeo, are too old to check. Unless the checkusers have saved records somewhere, you will need to provide proven old IP addresses or recent confirmed sockpuppets. (I can confirm one of Terryeo's IP addresses if it is needed.) Thatcher131 05:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Jayjg or Dmcdevit may. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to be Terryeo, and I don't have records for AI or any of his socks. However, ✅ that Highfructosecornsyrup most certainly is a sock of another user:. The sock appears to have been a straw-man sock, and was used for double voting (albiet, opposite votes) in several AFDs. What to do with it should be left to the admins. Essjay ( Talk )  05:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''