Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hkelkar

Awareoftypes
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar edit in Banga Sena and other India related articles.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 16:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. No sleepers on his range. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

70.112.79.217
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar reverts. Cheackuser needed to unearth the rest of the sockfarm.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hardblocked IP for one month. The following are ✅ as Hkelkar:

Road Runner ISP in Austin, Texas – it's always Hkelkar. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

All accounts indef blocked by Nishkid64, I went ahead and tagged them. Tiptoety talk 05:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Coachedontop
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar edits. Cheackuser needed to unearth the rest of the sockfarm.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following:

I'll do some more digging through the IPs from the few dozen Hkelkar socks I blocked last month. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 17:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Taskvalues
Code letter: B

Drive by reverts to Hkeklar's version: (taskvalues) (globalgo). Dance With The Devil (talk) 00:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 02:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 02:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Mayamistake
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar reverts.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the usual Hkelkar sockfarm:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 18:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, all blocked. No, I haven't tagged these, there's no point. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 18:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Sindhian
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar edit. Checkuser needed to unearth the rest of the sockfarm.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

✅:
 * Twiceshook2
 * Teamsofmany
 * Waterstop
 * Wheelsthem

Also:

on
 * Sindhian
 * Wwethepowerisback

Could you provide evidence for suspecting these users?

Finally, for Livedanddied.

Sam Korn (smoddy) 15:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * all confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 19:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Phew! Lot of work, lot of socks. Per my talk page request, I'm going to try later to see if I can get some long-term blocks / rangeblocks in place to limit the damage and timewasting that this guy is foisting on the project - A l is o n  ❤ 22:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Chiefofall
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - It is boring job for everyone - who is filing the chechuser request, who is checking the IP and the administrator who is blocking. But Hkelkar does not care and probably will not stop. After seeing what is going on, I think an AntiHkelkarBot will be needed.....probably. It is very obvious Hkelkar sock per edit history. Checkuser is needed to be confirm before blocking.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

-- Thatcher 04:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked and tagged all of them... Tiptoety  talk 06:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Zarina3
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar edits. Checkuser needed to unearth the rest of the sockfarm.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * - very obvious Hkelkar sock per contribs.


 * ✅ - the following accounts as socks of User:Hkelkar :




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 09:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, Christ. All blocked now. Damn it, I hate this bastard. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 18:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Kiran bedera


Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence - Patented Hkelkar edits. Ckechuser needed on the similar ground of Requests for checkuser/Case/Eagerbeaver434 to unearth the rest of the sockfarm.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ and - the following accounts as :




 * - the following:




 * ❌ - the following:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 23:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Confirmed socks blocked and tagged. WjBscribe 01:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked the possibles as well. Moreschi (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thomsonandthompson
Code letter: B


 * Supporting evidence - Seems to be an obvious Hkelkar sock to me, but there is some concern that this might be impersonating Hkelkar. Would like a CU to confirm onwiki. Thanks, ~ Riana ⁂  00:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Hkelkar, along with User:Aceh was hit and User:Herdeggo. Dmcdevit·t 00:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Najila Abdurrahman


Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence: patented Hkelkar reverts. Doldrums (talk) 13:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * checkuser requested to unearth the rest of the farm that's surely out there, going by user's history. Doldrums (talk) 14:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All blocked, but yeah, there's probably more + an IP that needs blocking. Moreschi (talk) 13:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - big surprise there. The following only, can't see any others:




 * - some of the long-term Hkelkar ones had expired and he'd returned - A l is o n  ❤ 01:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * already blocked, I've done the tagging. Spebi 03:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Do chashme





 * Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence: Special:Contributions/Do chashme, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persecution_of_Hindus&action=history

Brand new user appears out of nowhere on a favoured Hkelkar haunt, begins reverting Otolemur crassicaudatus. Precedent leads me to believe there will be more socks. Note that I've blocked Do chashme based on my own deductions and will gladly unblock with apologies if I am incorrect. ~ Riana ⁂ 07:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Rohini godbole and 70.112 added by Otolemur. ~ Riana ⁂ 07:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment This checkuser is needed on the similar ground of Requests for checkuser/Case/Eagerbeaver434. It is very emergency. Hkelkar is continuously creating socks to revert other's edits. It is very much necessary to identify the particular IP and block it. Otherwise Hkelkar vandalism of wikipedia is impossible to stop.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The Rohini godbole account was created only for reverting my edits in NCERT controversy‎ and Ayodhya debate.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

✅ along with:
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the IPs involved. Dmcdevit·t 08:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you - all blocked and tagged. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Lostanos





 * Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence: Special:Contributions/Lostanos

Lostanos appeared out of nowhere (brand new account), tagged 50-ish existing blocked Hkelkar socks with sockpuppet templates, was noticed by several people and blocked by me.

Corvus' first impression was that this was Hkelkar on a PR stunt of some sort, and I tend to agree. Given that a bunch more were blocked earlier today...

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Also see where they explicitly admit to being a secondary account of an existing user, and state that they're going to go back to editing with that one. Which may be completely innocent, but is at the least suspicious behavior with this particular account. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * - A l is o n  ❤ 06:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Since now




  .
 * Code letter: B
 * Supporting evidence:

Hi, while a request for checkuser for a new account with only a small number of edits might seem against the spirit of this page, I have reason to believe that the user User:Since now may be a sockpuppet of User:Hkelkar. The only other time I have been accused of poisoning the well, or have encountered allegations of blood libel, (which I find incredibly offensive and an indication of bad faith editing) was on the Criticism of HRW page, where Hkelkar focussed almost entirely on inserting references to the SAAG, and removing material and statements critical of Hindu involvement in the Gujarat riots (and inserting statements downplaying the same). Hkelkar has used many puppets, and has been blocked many times. Given the extremely similar editing behaviour, and the possibility of this being a single purpose account, I feel a checkuser is justified. If there are no connections, I withdraw and apologise. Mostlyharmless (talk) 08:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * histmerged from Requests for checkuser/Case/Since now, code letter. -- lucasbfr  talk 09:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the user indefinitely as a likely sock or meatpuppet of Hkelkar, but if checkuser could have a look at the underlying IPs and take them out of play for a couple of months, that would be much appreciated. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 12:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ as Hkelkar -




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 00:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All blocked. I've taken the liberty of unblocking the IP and reblocking it for a couple of extra months. Hkelkar doesn't have an infinite supply of IPs, so I've heard, and long blocks on the ones he does use can be useful. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 00:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure - no problem - A l is o n  ❤ 00:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All tagged. Keilana | Parlez ici 01:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Hkelkar


Posted over at WP:AE. Behenuir edits with a similar pro-Hindutva POV; very first edits were reverting other users; similar interest in antisemitism as shown by edits on Timeline of antisemitism. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: B (case)
 * Code letter: B (case)
 * Code letter: B (case)
 * Code letter: B (case)
 * Added Makthusian, who I've blocked as an Hkelkar sock already, based on his instant reverts in articles where Hkelkar socks have been active; but if you're checking already, it won't hurt to make sure... --Akhilleus (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Added another one from a few weeks back, worth checking. Moreschi Talk 09:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

✅. All of the following are also confirmed Hkelkar socks, many unblocked:


 * Khurdihar
 * Mahimahi2232
 * Sevenpenny
 * Behenuir
 * Remoteapp101
 * Kinurem
 * Yitzhak Hudas
 * Rapidsurfer
 * Humourquick
 * Benjamin P. Holder
 * Lalak-jan-shaheed
 * Ibn hamad
 * Wikibuv
 * Legal mothra
 * The new urukhai
 * Thegoldenageoftheflyingspaghettimonster
 * Shallowthinker
 * Kodos the executioner
 * Minyaan
 * Clerical worker
 * Raoul Pelaf
 * Lormacampbell
 * Residential neanderthal
 * Dreidelplayer
 * Caskofamontillado
 * Mont Blanc Pen
 * Behenuir
 * Benjamin P. Holder
 * Thegoldenageoftheflyingspaghettimonster
 * Herbert von Karajan
 * Dutyfreebooze
 * Holdthrillu2
 * Bazaar4568
 * Kahifarr
 * Kihim barr
 * Rapidsurfer
 * Yitzhak Hudas
 * Dmcdevit·t 00:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * All now blocked, including some of his IPs hardblocked for six months. Moreschi Talk 00:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)

New accounts jump straight into controversial editing with a POV similar to Hkelkar's. Several of these accounts' edits follow in the footsteps of User:Bakasuprman (e.g. and ) and other users have accused these accounts of being socks of Bakasuprman. It seems more likely that this is Hkelkar. The two-word usernames like Stripwaves and Giveover match other Hkelkar socks like User:Helptypes and User:Guideurge. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added another likely sockpuppet found revert-warring to establish similar fundamentalist POV here. Infact, this account's log contains only reverts. Anwar 18:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm adding User:Meherjunoon, a single-purpose account edit warring on Romila Thapar. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

✅ all, plus these:

Block and be merry. Mackensen (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Gr8India





 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)

Gr8India's choice of username suggests an Indian nationalist POV similar to Hkelkar.

Gr8India self-identifies as Jewish, just as Hkelkar did.

Account's first edit yesterday at 23:54 is to change "Muslim" to "Islamofascist" (an favorite bugbear of Hkelkar's) in the article "Anti-Hinduism" (a favorite haunt of Hkelkar's).

Gr8India similarly inserts the phrase "Islamist terrorism and Islamofascism" into the article "India-Israel relations".

3 of Gr8India's first 4 edits are to ballot-stuff Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Workshop in support of Hkelkar's allies and in opposition to his adversaries.

JFD 03:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Blocked by DaGizza. JFD 12:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[personal attacks removed]


 * I can't believe you people engage in personal attacks on the checkuser page. Tell ya what, I see even one more wee bit of personal attack from either of you here, and you'll be immediately blocked for disruption, to last until I'm in a better mood. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar
Suspiciously familiar editing pattern as well as edit summaries ("hate speech", "massive hatemongering", "vandal move", etc.) Hornplease 19:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)
 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)
 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)
 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)

✅ and too. Dmcdevit·t 21:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar



 * }}


 * Code letter: B (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar)

Within an hour or so of its own creation, User:Shiftnever created another account, User:Freespeec3. The latter username was used to e-mail user:Sukh17 about Administrators noticeboard/Incidents. The e-mail was a warning message regarding this case that Sukh17 was to communicate to me. D X-Rama's arrow (are u ready) 20:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * moved from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ User:Freespeec3, changed code letter to B. -- lucasbfr talk 20:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Shiftnever and Freespeec3 are on open proxies, so it's a dead end. As for checking any of the remaining accounts against each other, I would refer you to the impending arbitration case, where arbitration-related checkuser requests are to be listed, as stated in the RFCU header. Dmcdevit·t 06:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar



 * Report initially created at 22:33, April 3, 2007 (UTC) by Kathanar without critical information; gaps filled in by Daniel.Bryant.


 * per lack of code letter and rationale behind the request -- lucasbfr talk 18:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Code letter: F

Hkelkar is banned for however-long by ArbCom/the community/whatever, see his userpage.

I can't speculate on the initial motives of Kathanar when creating this request, however it does seem like Sifr-arbaa has a very similar POV-editing and confrontational style to Hkelkar and all his socks (see below).

Please run a checkuser to determine whether this is the banned user Hkelkar evading his block for the nth time. Cheers,  Daniel Bryant  22:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * -- lucasbfr talk 22:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Arbitration case which resulted in the ban of user. Real96 23:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

✅. Dmcdevit·t 22:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also ✅:


 * Dmcdevit·t 22:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More ✅:
 * Dmcdevit·t 22:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More ✅:
 * Dmcdevit·t 22:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More ✅:
 * Dmcdevit·t 22:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More ✅:


 * Dmcdevit·t 23:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks,  Daniel Bryant  06:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks,  Daniel Bryant  06:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: B

All three users have editing patterns similar to Hkelkar. Known Hkelkar socks and IPs can be found here and here. Hkelkar was banned by the ArbCom here, and has been indef-blocked for ban-evasion. Aksi_great (talk) 05:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ Khazadum, Birdsmight, and Triedsolve are Hkelkar.
 * ❌: Scheibenzahl.
 * ✅ additional Hkelkar accounts found on the IPs are, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . Dmcdevit·t 06:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

70.113.112.244

 * (conf. already)
 * Code letter: F
 * (conf. already)
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F

Ssee the edit pattern of 70.113.112.244 in the article National_Development_Front in the changes, , ,

It is similar to the edits done by User:Bakasuprman and User:Lionheart5 --Fear the Fire 11:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Please read related RFCU on Requests for checkuser/Case/Lionheart-- Ed  ¿Cómo estás? 02:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment by outsider - There is no need to run this checkuser. I have already blocked this IP as an obvious sock of Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: F

Hkelkar is banned for however-long by ArbCom/the community/whatever.

The behaviour here is resoundingly similar. Both Hkelkar and Lionheart share a fondness for a similar POV/editing style on these articles:-


 * Anti-Hinduism
 * Narendra Modi
 * Romila Thapar
 * William Dalrymple (historian)
 * Aurangzeb

Checkusers, please also note Requests for checkuser/Case/Lionheart, which is pending currently. There are a variety of other, closed requests which relate to that other request; namely, Requests for checkuser/Case/Bakasuprman, in particular.

Cheers,  Daniel Bryant  05:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, I think I'm perma-recused from any clerk actions related to Hkelkar et al.  Daniel Bryant  05:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

. Dmcdevit·t 06:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: F

This user is displaying some traits highly reminiscent of banned user (by ArbCom), Hkelkar. Given his other sock, Rumpelstiltskin223, was just blocked (and this account suddenly becomes more frequently used), I am pretty sure, but I want absolute confirmation first. Basically fiest edit was uploading a picture of something related to a "famous Baghdadi Jew philanthropist", which anyone who knows Hkelkar will find mildly amusing as being so blatant. Daniel.Bryant 09:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

✅. Dmcdevit·t 09:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: B, F

User:Rumpelstiltskin223 has been blocked for a week for repeated 3RR violations. I'm very familiar with this editor and his editing patterns.In turn, other editors have alleged that Rumplestiltskin223 is a returning sockpuppet of Hkelkar. As of Today an anonymous IP editor is editing in the exact same articles Rumplestiltskin223 edits, using the same line of rhetoric and engaging in the same practice of blanking text without explanation while demonstrating an awareness of WP policies at the same time (see edit comments). The IP shows a short editing career, and yet he immagiely jumps into the same articles Rumplestiltskin habitually edit wars in. What cements the arguement that the two are the same person is their shared view of Devdasi, including their rebuttals against it being considered a form of prostitution. MinaretDk 18:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Edit:I'm new to these proceedings, learning the ropes from some admins. I found that checks on the Hkelkar account have been done in the past. Please just check the anon IP with Rumplestiltskin225. MinaretDk 18:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * (Recusing) "Hkelkar editing under any name or anonymous ip is banned from Wikipedia for one year". Daniel.Bryant 21:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Despite the last check in December finding Hkelkar and Rumplestiltskin225 are, it has been suggested on ANI that holidays etc. were around that time, meaning Hkelkar would have been away from his old IP; he could be back now. I ask that Rumplestiltskin225 be checked against Hkelkar again for clarification. Daniel.Bryant 21:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I can pretty much guarantee that Hkelkar is editing again. He made this following massive edit to add text to the article Persecution of Hindus:. The anon IP address edited again recently to replace "citations needed" attached to Hkelkar's edits (under the banned sock "Shiva's Trident") with sources to several of those edits. These sources are books, not websites, so it's impossible that anon simply went online and searched the text. One of the books is a 1969 edition, the other 1953. That two unrelated editors would know the exact sources to several occurances of small amounts of texts is almost unfathomable. The sources aren't popular books, and the sourced content aren't verses of poetry or scripture. Added to all the past cases of suspicions against Hkelkar, and the points I raised above, the case that Hkelkar is back is solid. If the anon turns out to match Rumplestiltskin's IP, then it can be safely confirmed that Rumplestiltskin is Hkelkar, regardless of a change of address by the editor. MinaretDk 22:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The charges that users editing the same pages are the same user are baseless. Minaretdk is more likely a sock of banned anti-Semitic troll (who has tried to evade the ban before and got caught a few times). Baka  man  22:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

✅ that IP matches Rumplestiltskin; it's at nomachine.com, which is essentially an open proxy. Hkelkar is stale, though possibly other CUs might have IP backup info. One of Rumplestiltskin's IPs was an open proxy or compromised system of some sort; it's been blocked. I'm thinking we should do a range block on nomachine.com; someone might wish to research this. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 22:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * User:Bakasuprman is listed below as one of the suspected socks of Hkelkar/Rumplestiltskin223. Can someone check his ID against the anon and that of Rumplestiltskin? MinaretDk 03:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Its not like you are going to get any sort of results in your trolling endeavor. Baka man  03:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: B

User:Rumpelstiltskin223 is a sockpuppet of the user User:Hkelkar who was banned for 1 year on Dec 10. This user became active only after the ban, although the account was created earlier. Pattern of edit of both of them are same, revert all the edits by other users without discussing it, blatant POV pushing, personal attack, incivility. One intersting thing is that the edit using this account is done 24x7 non-stop. How is it humanly possible to edit without sleep or rest 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Same seems to be characteristic of Hkelkar also.

If there is some procedural problem in this request please let me know and I will correct it. This is my first such request and I am not aware of all the procedures. StopUntouchability 09:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * "Hkelkar editing under any name or anonymous ip is banned from Wikipedia for one year". Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 09:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * discussion about whether the applicant for this request is a sockpuppet/meatpuppet has been moved to the talk page. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 21:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

. Essjay   ( Talk )  00:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar





 * Code letter: F

Just like Subhash and Hkelkar ref:Talk:Lalu Prasad Yadav, Talk:Kancha Ilaiah, and also see Talk:Yadav, before starting their trolling behaviour accuses users there of unfounded allegations also look at the Ip adress of this new user (left accidently from comment in continuity  ) traced to texas.  Ikon  |no-blast 09:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, please execute this RFCU with celerity.Look carefully at the dns resolution. It points to HOUSTON, Texas. I am from AUSTIN, Texas. Ikonoblast could do well to learn some basic geography. There is a 162 mile distance between the two cities see.The fact that I am from Austin is established by this and the results of the previous RFCU.
 * Plus, the listing of Subhash Bose above is redundant as RFCU has already made a (misleading) declaration on this matter previously (see below).Hkelkar 13:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ❌. Dmcdevit·t 21:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hkelkar




User densaguo was created after subhash was banned and then Hkelkar lobbied for Subhash's relaxation and extension of Holywarrior's ban same is repeated by Densaguo  almost to word at a different place besides he refers Subhash as Netaji cannot be known to new user for he was not even useng it as signature   Ikon   |no-blast 13:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This accusation again?An RFCU was filed against me earlier for the expressed purpose of getting me blocked as part of a defmaation campaign against me and was rather quickly dismissed by admins. I believe that the motivations of the user who has files this RFCU should be analysed, given his block log both as ikonoblast and his earlier user User:Holywarrior.Hkelkar 21:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

See previous case Requests for checkuser/Case/Subhash bose. The report wasn't "dismissed," the evidence at that time was inconclusive. Thatcher131 22:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Reply to all - There have been three checkusers filed for Subhash_bose and one for Hkelkar all by the same cabal of editors. It seems WP:Tendentious editors (including the one that filed this RFCU) have nothing to do but to harp on about fantasical conspiracy theories.Bakaman Bakatalk 23:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Discussion moved to talk page. Thatcher131 22:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * So what's the code letter? It's not specified. Shouldn;t this be "declined" per other RFCU's above?Hkelkar 04:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Codes are A,B,C and F.  Ikon   |no-blast 06:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * But none of these users are banned.Hkelkar 15:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Besides, if you see WP:Sock Puppet the criteria listed is that only block/ban evading sock puppets are bad and there have been no contribs from the other users in some time (one week I believe is the official time frame). Plus, baka's account has 1000+ edits so he's clearly not a sock. This RFCU is bogus.Hkelkar 16:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Besides, I do not believe Subhash was ever banned. He was blocked for some time (he had some tendentious editing and was rather hotheaded but basically a decent editor) but the block is lifted.None of these users (myself included) have been abusive per wikipedia policies.Hkelkar 16:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

My attention has been drawn to this page by Hkelkar.I haven't been editing much on account of the fact that I have been busy with my academic work.I must point out that this "sockpuppetry" accusation is essentially a McCarthyist witch-hunt by Ikonoblast (formerly User:Holywarrior; if you have popups then you can see his former block-log) who has been a long time sparring partner, of sort, of mine and, from what I can see from his contribs, Hkelkar's as well. He has also made similar accusations before in order to extract summary judgements and get those people blocked who expose his illicit abuse of wikipedia (such as mis-citing POV claims, OR, and routine harrassment of several wikipedia users). As you can see, I have not been blocked for long time so the accusation of block/ban evading sockpuppetry is moot. If you see the earlier RFCU, then you will see that we have adequately proved (to the best of our abilities) as different users to two admins on irc (consult admins User:Srikeit and User:Blnguyen for details).Plus, I'm sure a simple perusal into the apache server logs will establish that we are two different people from two different places.RFCU's such as this, from what I can see, are a platform for summary judgements based on little or no evidence and no criteria other than the whims of the admin viewing the page. I urge the admins to investigate all objective records, including isp logs, Apache logs, and the past RFCU before making hasty decisions.G'Day.Shiva&#39;s Trident 17:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * It is that Hkelkar is Subhash bose. The others are . (By the looks of it, with so much edit warring and misconduct all around, this conflict looks to be ready for arbitration, or decisive admin intervention.) Dmcdevit·t 19:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * May I ask on what basis is this assertion of likelihood made exactly? Thanks.Hkelkar 19:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The basis for the assertation is based upon technical evidence provided by the checkuser tool extension to MediaWiki software wikipedia uses. It cross-links certain server logs.  Due to privacy and checkuser policy, the technical evidence is never provided.  Kevin_b_er 21:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

discussion moved to talk page Bakaman Bakatalk 00:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''