Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Holywarrior

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Holywarrior




I blocked for 48 hours for having an attacking user page, personal attacks against others and for trolling commentary of WP:AN. The diff is here:.

showed activity for the first time in a month to immediately post commentary on Holywarrior's block:, to participate in an AfD involving Holywarrior: , and to call another user that Holywarrior had debated with a vandal.

Samir  धर्म 20:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Plz don't expect too much of my edits in future either,I don't have much time for these things.I am at most a wiki reader.Thanks.Wmnnzzr 09:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Samir forgot,There was one more contribution on Talk:Yadav page.I have mostly contributed there only . Smiles Wmnnzzr 10:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Interesting indeed. Wmnnzzr admits here that, he is infact the "co-editer of Holywarrior", and has created Holywarrior's account. --Ragib 16:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * All the links samir talks about are present on Holywarrior's userpage,so the allegation lacks ground,however wmnnzzr's admission/claim looks strange.I wonder why he is creating trouble for himself.Notable fact is that this person has voted against the motion on Bhurabal and has lobbied for Holywarrior in WP:AN,why so???59.162.248.193 13:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * All the socks I had are listed on my userpage.Anybody suspecting or having knowledge of other socks are welcome to bring to notice,but some logic is expected.Holywarrior 10:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * wmnnzzr sometimes shared my pc(never allowed to do so at the same time) because he has worked with me ,but not always.Both of us must be having a large number of IPs because we are marketing guys sometimes working together too.Holywarrior 10:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

✅ that they edit from the same location. In light of the above, make of that what you will. Mackensen (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''