Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/HughD

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

HughD



 * G:


 * Supporting evidence: User:HughD and I have been debating at Toni Preckwinkle regarding the inclusion of text reqgding legislation that she sponsered and had implimented breifly, but that was vetoed. It is far and away the most significant thing she has done legislatively as an alderman because it was written about in dozens of newspapers.  Anyone who wants to see it omitted is really not attempting to improve the project.  the following are repeated attempts to remove the content.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 08:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * first attempt
 * second attempt

Then I beefed up the content to clarify its importance.
 * post expansion removal
 * seeming sockpuppet removal
 * To clarify, you think that HughD broke 3RR using a sockpuppet? -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 10:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No he did not break 3RR. I only check the page 3 times a week for content removal and vandalism.  However, in recent times, he has attempted to remove important content and now seems intent to do so with a sock.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

as to if =
 * ✅ =   — Rlevse •  Talk  • 00:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''