Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImpuMozhi

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

ImpuMozhi




Vandalizing pages of rajput kings by adding derogatory rajput chief category and also changing ruling clans of india category. Jujinho 14:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Jujinho is one of more than 50 vandal sockpuppets created by one permabanned user with an Arbcom judgment against him; see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Shivraj Singh / DPSingh for a partial listing. The complaint above is not to be taken seriously, but if Checkuser has time, please look into these 50 accounts (importantly User:Shivraj Singh and User:DPSingh) and publish a list of editors using the same IP. That may well prove useful. Regards, ImpuMozhi 14:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Small comment: Jujinho left this message in User_talk:Muhammad al-Islami, which says Suar/Sockpuppet back off. the first word being the Hindi/Indian term for a pig. I guess this checkuser is really a call for arbitration/mediation. --Ragib 15:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

see also Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput. If you wish to file a request for checkuser against possible sockpuppets of DPSingh, please add the information to the top of Requests for checkuser/Case/DPSingh and then list the page here. Thatcher131 15:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: A classical Checkuser against Jujinho and his earlier Rajput incarnations will hardly be necessary as the identity is obvious. For the mass-vandalism problem caused by this user, see recent AN posting by Dbachmann here . The above request by Jujinho is frivolous and should be speedily closed/declined/deleted/whatever, as illegitimate activity of a permabanned user (possibly Speedy G5). The editors mentioned are simply doing the hard work of mass-reverting his daily disruptions. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * There's no speedy procedure for checkuser requests. This will have to wait until one of the checkuser admins rules on it. Thatcher131 16:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

. No evidence of policy violation presented. Mackensen (talk) 17:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''