Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jew Aardvark

Jew Aardvark
Here are some more. First wave:



Second wave:



MER-C 12:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

One more: MER-C 08:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * This group done. Mackensen (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Just when you thought it was over:



MER-C 08:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

A self-confessed sockpuppet: (see ) MER-C 09:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Second bunch in two hours:



MER-C 10:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not a clerk or checkuser, but some of these usernames are so obviously sockpuppets (or impersonators) that they don't require the intensive checkuser search. Simply report them as obvious sockpuppets or impersonators (or bad usernames) to get them indef blocked. Let's not waste Mackensen's valuable time with these obvious cases, shall we? --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Oh, and as a postscript, all these usernames are blocked. I think it's best to report these names elsewhere, such as Suspected sock puppets or WP:ANI. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Actually, this is useful, because many of these come from open proxies, which I can then identify and block. Mackensen (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay, then perhaps I should retract my statement. I was concerned about RFCU time, but if you have no complaints, then neither shall I. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Yesterday's haul of sockpuppets:



MER-C 09:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

. I blocked several. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Three more:



MER-C 03:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

. I blocked. FWIW these in at least some cases don't respond to an open proxy scan. I'm blocking anyway in the absence of useful edits under the presumption that they're either zombies or open proxies that are not always operating. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 04:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Another bunch:



MER-C 05:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Yet another lot:



MER-C 12:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)