Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jimbopheel

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Jimbopheel



 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: Editor apparently growing a sock farm; all newish accounts, all apparently related to each other: some obvious name pairs, common low-rate edit and move warring in Islamabad (  etc) pointy advocacy  and all, of course, signed the "petition" to unblock the apparent puppeteer Personally I think the whole bunch quack loudly, but others at ANI feel a CU is warranted. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, look! Yet another.  also the Islamabad rename and anti religion.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting tiresome. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: Editor apparently growing a sock farm; all newish accounts, all apparently related to each other: some obvious name pairs, common low-rate edit and move warring in Islamabad (  etc) pointy advocacy  and all, of course, signed the "petition" to unblock the apparent puppeteer Personally I think the whole bunch quack loudly, but others at ANI feel a CU is warranted. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, look! Yet another.  also the Islamabad rename and anti religion.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting tiresome. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: Editor apparently growing a sock farm; all newish accounts, all apparently related to each other: some obvious name pairs, common low-rate edit and move warring in Islamabad (  etc) pointy advocacy  and all, of course, signed the "petition" to unblock the apparent puppeteer Personally I think the whole bunch quack loudly, but others at ANI feel a CU is warranted. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, look! Yet another.  also the Islamabad rename and anti religion.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting tiresome. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting tiresome. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting tiresome. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

To me, this case is really obvious. But also, there is no way Jimbopheel is the real master, the acct is not even two weeks old. Suggest CU try to find the real puppetmaster and unknown accts. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 16:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * to another checkuser for opinions on a possible master account here - Alis o n  ❤ 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * to another checkuser for opinions on a possible master account here - Alis o n  ❤ 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * to another checkuser for opinions on a possible master account here - Alis o n  ❤ 19:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Still active, asked Deskana to check for a master — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlevse (talk • contribs) 11:05, 4 December 2007 ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''