Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jj0909jj

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Jj0909jj



 * Code letter:C.


 * Supporting evidence: I know this is going to be horribly stale, but if this prolific sockpuppeteer is back, I don't expect this is the only account he's using. The first thing I noticed is this user follows the identical pattern exhibited before of always using cryptic (but accurate) edit summaries describing the changes he's making (which leads users applying the AGF principle to mistakenly believe this user's edits are not vandalism but simply unhelpful). See also edits at Commons for the typical behavior of removing or changing icons in templates (examples from previous socks:) and for also changing fonts used in articles (examples from previous socks:). Also weird declarative sentences always in simple present tense. (.) -Nard 01:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See also, other recent activity by this user. -Nard 01:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * , unless his IP was written down somewhere.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to chose Australia's next top model! ) 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Although there is some evidence that the edits are coming from the same geopolitical entity. -- Avi (talk) 02:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've found this to be, same ISP, same city. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 03:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Followup: Mytestuser was blocked separately as a vandalism account after this finding. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Jj0909jj



 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jj0909jj

Disruptive edits across all socks, randomly changing template icons to match Windows XP icons, uploading these same icons, randomly changing verb tenses to the past tense, randomly changing words to the contracted versions. Many more examples just by looking through contribution histories and upload logs. Incredibly, he leaves accurate edit summaries on all his disruptive edits. Nardman1 18:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: C


 * If it is possible, I'd like to add:
 * based upon similar image changes
 * based on multiple similar image changes, re-uploading suspect image
 * and all three based upon re-uploading Image:WinXP_important.png. --Iamunknown 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * and all three based upon re-uploading Image:WinXP_important.png. --Iamunknown 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

✅, and, , , and. Dmcdevit·t 05:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''