Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Julie Dancer

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Julie Dancer



 * Code letter:F


 * Supporting evidence: User:Julie Dancer engaged in sockpuppetry at Articles for deletion/Optimal classification, voting/commenting also as User:Adaptron here, as User:71.100.167.93 here, and admits to it here. Since then Julie was blocked for harrassment, and I reblocked when the harrassment continued.

The other accounts listed are obvious, based on their contributions. I'm hoping to see if a rangeblock on 71.100.0.0/16 would be effective, and if there are any other sleeper accounts hiding down there.

See also Suspected sock puppets/Julie Dancer, WP:ANI.

- Kevin (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - all of the above accounts - A l is o n  ❤ 09:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Re. the rangeblock; a quick sweep shows no apparent sleeper accounts. However, due to the activity and number of editors on this range, as well as the level of abuse here, I do not recommend a rangeblock at this time. There will be far too much collateral damage - A l is o n  ❤ 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Alison. I thought that might be the case. Her socks are pretty easy to spot, so they can be dealt with as they arise. Kevin (talk) 09:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''