Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Julius Ceasarus From Primus

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Julius Ceasarus From Primus



 * Code letter: C, F


 * '''Supporting evidence:
 * Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Julius Ceasarus From Primus
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/RestoreTheEmpireSociety


 * 
 * 
 * 

The indef.blocked Julius Ceasarus From Primus has great interests in early history of China and Korea, especially anything related "empire" given his previous names are emperors of China or other countries and his edits are within such field. Note the same mention of Kublai Khan He's currently living in NYC and using Version ISP which were confirmed by the past RFCU on him. An anon with same IP and agenda has appeared at Wei Man, and attacked user Kuebie, whom the troll has antagonized constantly. I think the newbie, Alitla Gruppels who also appears the page to vote is the same person as well as Lord Archivo. Given his abusive sockpuppeting, there would be more accounts. The user also has a typical misselling on capital letters such as USer:KuebieSo KOrsentry. He also tends to seek his queries from admins, Nlu, Kwamikagami and editors, PericlesofAthens, Yug etc. And he seems to have a great obsession with several editors like,. Given his long term disruption, range block is necessary again.--Caspian blue 05:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅ that the following match each other:
 * ✅ that the following match each other:
 * that the two groups above are related, but no direct overlap. – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:
 * ✅ that the following match each other:
 * that the two groups above are related, but no direct overlap. – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:
 * ✅ that the following match each other:
 * that the two groups above are related, but no direct overlap. – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:
 * that the two groups above are related, but no direct overlap. – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:
 * that the two groups above are related, but no direct overlap. – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:
 * Apparently, there's some overlap between the socks that I tagged as a few days ago and Julius Ceasarus From Primus socks. After doing some digging and looking at the rangeblocks implemented by Alison in the  RFCU, I've ✅ that  =  (also confirmed by Luna Santin). Here's a list of socks from the ranges:

Three IP rangeblocks implemented:, ,. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 08:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the efforts, Luna Santin and Nishkid64! What a sock farm......-_-;; I think this RFCU along with 1,2 on the same troll should be merged into Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ.--Caspian blue 08:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * blocked the one that slipped away, the rest was blocked already. No need to tag these I hope? :P -- lucasbfr  talk 13:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

User:Sea888



 * Code letter: PLACE A CODE LETTER HERE (SEE WP:RFCU)


 * '''Supporting evidence:

Both of them are attempting to force a point of view on articles, that Nanyue was a vietnamese kingdom, and not ruled by a chihnese. both are trying to minimize chinese influnce on vietnamese culture, people, and genetics. both try to force a point of view that cantonese and vietnamese are descended froma common ancestor.Confucionsarusnouirus (talk) 22:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - How did the brand-new user Confucionsarusnouirus figure out how to do a RFC within one day of being a registered Wikipedian? Something seems very strange. Most likely, User:Confucionsarusnouirus needs to have an RFC about him/herself to verify that s/he does not already have a registered account under a different user name. Badagnani (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ that submitting user matches the following:
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of the originally listed accounts, David873 is, but other checkusers may have relevant data still if there's compelling reason to suspect further sockpuppetry beyond what I've listed (if not, I'd say ). It's worth noting that two of the accounts I listed have been active for a fairly long time. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment OMG, so I was harassed by and then his sock,  changed his attitude the next day and then on behalf of me, he reported somebody who followed and harassed me? -_-;; I suspect this is a clearly reincarnation of  who has a deep grudge against me for his indef.blocked status. ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ inserted very similar contents to Cantonese people just like Mustafa inserted dubious contents regarding DNA to Koreans. Besides,  and  asked favors to admin Nlu, and Kwami just like ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ did. I think this file should be merged with Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ.--Caspian blue 00:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This does overlap with Requests for checkuser/Case/Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (2nd request), as well as the case you mentioned. – Luna Santin  (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - Can't the IP be blocked so no new usernames can be created from that IP? This is getting out of hand. Badagnani (talk) 01:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * All blocked.  MBisanz  talk 02:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Request Copied from Luna Santin's talk page

Hello, Luna Santin, could you check on who appears with same agendas with 's socks as well as his same phobia as suggested his new name.--Caspian blue 01:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In progress. ✅ so far...
 * Will post more if they turn up. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also . – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Will post more if they turn up. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also . – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also . – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Question - How is this happening (new usernames popping up from the same individual, presumably using the same computer) if the IPs are already blocked? Badagnani (talk) 19:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.'' ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''