Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/K69

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

K69 and 62.56.64.118



 * Code letter: A


 * Supporting evidence:

I strongly suspect that User:K69 is the same as User:62.56.64.118. K69 recently posted an attack on User talk:Justallofthem and some rather inappropriate external links on Noelle North:

After I warned K69, 62.56.64.118 posted an attack on User talk:Justallofthem and a rather inappropriate external link on Noelle North:

I suppose I'm a coward for not getting Bishzilla to block the user straightaway, but, well, I am. Plus, only five diffs altogether are involved, and Scientologists get attacked a lot. Bishonen | talk 22:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC).
 * Added, .  Cirt (talk) 23:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Update: Meanwhile, both the IPs have been blocked for 1 day by. Cirt (talk) 23:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Added 2 more to above, . Cirt (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And . Cirt (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Added . Cirt (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

All right, this getting ridiculous, 'zilla block K69 for 48 hours, see previous blocks, and see user triumph in dynamic IP system.  bishzilla    ROA R R! !    07:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC).


 * ❌; K69 is on a different continent. Thatcher 13:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Roaar..? Unblocking user. Believe suitable time blocked as of now; Thatcher please check suitablity, read warning on K69's talkpage?   bishzilla     ROA R R! !    18:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC).

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''