Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kborer

Kborer
''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''



No diffs
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence:

I have suspected for some time that these users are the same person. There have been block periods when both have been largely absent (as in the period before Christmas and at other points in the last year) and other times when they are very active (as for example today). In the last 2 days, these users have been edit warring with myself and another user User:Gregalton at the article socialized medicine where both have 3RRd in the past 2 days. Both editors take similar stances editorially though Kborer is usually polite and the alleged alterego FreedomWarrior is aggressive. Both have been reinserting issues long ago closed and pushing POV and trying to shape the article along similar lines. Kborer who normally answers questions logically has been making unsubstantiated claims and ones that are demonstrably not true and failing to justify them when asked to do so multiple times. I have previously laid the claim on the talk page that I believed that these are the same person and interestingly neither denied it. One said he was amused by the accusation and the other has never responded. The talk page edits of today will give a flavour of what I am talking about. A quick checkuser would be appreciated. Tom (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

If possible to check IP addresses it may be a good idea to check back longer than 2 or 3 weeks back as that was the time I voiced my suspicions for the first time.--Tom (talk) 23:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ❌. And can someone do something about the revert war on the article. Looks like multiple people have done multiple 3RRs.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 01:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''