Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kidsunited

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Kidsunited


It seems that the guy User:Bloomfield who is known for creating fake states on WP is back in business by adding infoboxes that use city flags etc. and other fake or not relevant insignia for made up states. ,, Termer (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Bloomfield
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Bloomfield
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Bloomfield


 * - What is the role is Trainmoney to this case? Is he a sockpuppet? Where has this issue been discussed? -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure, here you go, .--Termer (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * / - No block log provided to original users block log. -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what the block log should be.--Termer (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This is the block log. - This is the users first block off Wikipedia. Code Letter F is for Ban or Block evasion. Unless I have mucked up somewhere, this is not eligible for a Checkuser. -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Interesting, so suspected banned sockpuppet masters are free to have fun on WP by creating new accounts as they please? I don't wish to get too much into the technicalities of this. But as the editing pattern of these accounts is way too similar to User:Bloomfield, something hasto be done about it. What would you suggest should be done in case you think this is not eligible for a Checkuser ?--Termer (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

(ec) This case is relisted. Checkusers can make the determination. -JodyBtalk 20:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 21:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged named accounts as socks of Bloomfield. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 12:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Could this user be checked too, editing patterns are similar, with articles on fake principalities in the same region. --Martintg (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 18:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''