Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LBHS Cheerleader

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

LBHS Cheerleader



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Possible LBHS Cheerleader sockpuppets, or more likely, CHS cheerleader sockpuppets. Tarpon cheerleaders have been known locally to be Wiki vandals (they are one reason why WP is blocked at CCPS), and it's really hard to say if these recent editors (who have been making similar edits and are likely either the same person or tag team editors) are socks of the banned Lemon Bay gang. C-ham 2009 added her self to the list of notable alumni at Charlotte High School (Punta Gorda, Florida), noting that she was the captain of the 2008 "cheerleading" squad for CHS. Although I don't know since I'm not a checkuser, it appears, based on some logged out vandalism that occured earlier this year, that LBHS Cheerleader edited from Embarq, and that's where 74.5.184.245 comes into the picture; it is an Embarq IP. Freaky Fishes is the most recent known LBHS Cheerleader sock, and therefore is most likely to still have checkuser logs available. However, LBHS Cheerleader disappeared for quite some time after an abuse report (see Abuse reports/71.3.247.94) with the exception of an unblock request which admitted that her service was shut off and she was editing from somewhere else, so I suppose that makes accurate conclusions based on checkuser difficult. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * LBHS Cheerleader and Freaky Fishes are, the others appear ❌; some geographical proximity but no technical indication that the same user is involved. &mdash; Coren (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * As an added note, some of those editors appear to be coming from mobile devices, so definitive exclusion will never be possible. &mdash; Coren (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''