Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LaruaWA11

LaruaWA11

 * Too many sockpuppets to list, need immediate attention.
 * Code letter: F.
 * Code letter: F.

LaruaWA11 is creating many accounts at high speed, posting unblock templates all over, and promising to continue until the LaruaWA11 account is unblocked. Obviously, we will not respond to threats like this (plus, I checked, and the original block was justified). Despite the obviousness of the sockpuppetry, I am requesting checkuser so that an IP block can be used to prevent this person's continuing abuse. Autoblocking and preventing account creation does not seem to work and sadly it looks as if a rangeblock may be necessary. Mango juice talk 17:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * A brief list of ones active today:

and many others. Mango juice talk 17:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - needless to say. Blocked the remaining accounts
 * - let me know if she changes it later - A l is o n  ❤ 19:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * all confirmed accounts blocked (not by me) and tagged accordingly. Spebi 20:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

LaruaWA11



 * unblock request
 * self-admission
 * unblock request
 * unblock request
 * unblock request
 * attack
 * attack
 * (see Special:DeletedContributions/Loractivirus_(LWA))
 * unblock request
 * unblock request
 * (see deleted edits)
 * unblock request
 * attack
 * (see deleted edits)
 * unblock request
 * (see deleted edits)
 * unblock request


 * Already blocked by checkuser:


 * Code letter: G

Since being blocked on the master account, the user has focused a lot of attention of posting unblock requests en masse (usually to the effect of "Leventorous was blocked unfairly") or attacking User:Equazcion (example). Is a hardblock possible in this case? – Luna Santin  (talk) 12:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Related IP Check case -- lucasbfr  talk 14:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)




 * - blocked ACB - A l is o n  ❤ 18:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''