Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lionheart5

Lionheart5





 * Code letter: E, B, A and C

 It is a sockpuppet

The user a new user and is a confirmed as the sockpuppet of  see:. is possible that or  are also related to the user from the edit history. see the similarity in edits in, and.

Check the 3RR the useruser:Lionheart5 is an new user and has continuously tried to attack on the article National_Development_Front. see the page for details. He has continous RVVs at,, and. Please verify this user. He is being warned by the users on the user pages and  but he continue doing the 3RR.

Review the pattern vandalism: see the edit pattern of user user:Lionheart5 in the article National_Development_Front in the patterns, , , ,. Then same can be seen in and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marad_massacre&action=history. --- Sundaram7 10:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment - This checkuser request is reduntant. A checkuser has already been run on the user and he has been subsequently blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Lionheart5



 * , it gives the pattern for vandalism [].
 * , it gives the pattern for vandalism [].
 * , it gives the pattern for vandalism [].
 * , it gives the pattern for vandalism [].
 * Code letter: A, C, E

The above users do continous vandals. They might be the sockpuppets. The user and IP above follow a pattern of vandalism []. The administrator user:Dbachmann was trying to get the page conflict [], but they continue vandals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganeshco (talk • contribs) 07:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

. If they are vandals, block them. If there is a pattern to the vandalism, give evidence of it. Essjay  ( Talk )  09:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''