Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lutherian

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

User:Deepblue06


If two or more of these users are the same person, then we would have a 3RR violation on Armenian Genocide. &mdash;Khoikhoi 00:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I also suspect that is somehow involved in all of this. &mdash;Khoikhoi 00:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

✅. Essjay  (  Talk  •  Connect  )  06:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Lutherian


If two or more of these people are the same, then we'd have a 3RRvio over on Armenian Genocide. &mdash; Khoikhoi  16:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Checkuser is not for fishing. See above: ''You must lay out clearly the evidence for sockpuppetry. You must explain how your request fits the policy above.'' Checkuser is not used to confirm "gut feelings" or curiosity; it is only used for cases where there is strong evidence of a connection and a serious matter of policy violation. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  08:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

,, ,
An edit war erupted involving Armenian Genocide yesterday, and eventually blocks were imposed for 3RR and NPA and article was semi-protected. Please check, however, if Lutherian is the same as any of the IPs engaged in the same pattern of behavior. (Lutherian's edits are not quite the same as those IPs, but suspiciously emerged only yesterday, at the same time as the IPs.) --Nlu (talk) 16:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Given that the anonymous user has been editing with various bunchs of IPs and not only in the Armenian genocide article, I doubt even if he was, the link could be made. But there are many other IPs under which he has contributed. Here some others., , , , , , , , , , , . I also suspect to be Lutherian or this anonymous user, or all of them all together if Lutherian is the anonymous user which is a possibility, since both have some similar habits, one of them was to capitilize my alias. This is also one of the problems since there is other users that should be checked in due time. But for now, knowing if either of those IPs can match either or both Shelby28 or Lutherian. Fad (ix) 17:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * It is HIGHLY LIKELY that Lutherian is most or all of those IPs. It is UNLIKELY that any of them are Shelby28. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Lutherian
Lutherian is currently blocked for trolling at Talk:Armenian Genocide. All of a sudden 83.77.132.16 pops up, with the exact same sarcastic tone of voice as Lutherian to continue a "discussion" with another user. Both Lutherian and the anon almost always end their sentences with either an exclamation point or "LOL". (same with 81.62.128.110 & 83.79.98.206) I have no doubts that L is evading his block. &mdash; Khoikhoi  23:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

✅. Essjay  (  Talk  •  Connect  )  18:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''