Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Memeco

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Memeco





 * Code letter:F 

Blocked user Jonathanmbaez who is the cousin of user EdwinCasadoBaez. EdwardCasadoBaez has personal knowledge of the blocking of user Jonathanbaez and has advocated for his unblocking. . EdwinCasadoBaez has stated that Memeco is the same user as Jonathanbeez and has continued on the personal attack nature of blocked user Jonathanbaez, as well as stated that he will continue future vandalism. YoSoyGuapo 08:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * user has been banned YoSoyGuapo 17:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

adding: per Requests for checkuser/Case/Jimmyjones1122:

Blocked user Jonathanmbaez who is stating that he is the cousin of user EdwinCasadoBaez and not EdwinCasadoBaez himself. We do know that EdwardCasadoBaez has personal knowledge of the blocking of user Jonathanbaez and has advocated for his unblocking. . EdwinCasadoBaez has stated that Memeco is the same user as Jonathanbaez and has continued on the personal attack nature of blocked user Jonathanbaez, as well as stated that he will continue future vandalism. As soon as Memeco was blocked user Jimmyjones1122 showed up doing the same edits that Memeco was doing. User EdwinCasadoBaez went on a previous checkuser case and started making personal attacks and stated that he is angry for his "cousin" being blocked. YoSoyGuapo 00:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)''

We are still dealing with more sockpuppet issues by sockpuppet of this account EdwinCasadoBaez. . The EdwinCasadoBaez account is blocked for one week and Jonathanbaez is indef blocked. Both account do the same edits and attack the same article, Dominican Republic. I've waited several days. Can a check user be run. The first one proved conclusive, but this one has taken a few days to be run. YoSoyGuapo 07:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * . They're not IP-related, though they're in the same geographic area. You'll need to use behavioral evidence rather than checkuser for this. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

so none of these 4 are related to each other or were those 2 not related to each other? 2 were already proved to be conclusive

64.131.205.111 00:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The original two are confirmed. The others are inconclusive to each other as well as the originals. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''