Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Merzbow

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Merzbow



 * (Known to be Supergreenred)
 * (known to be Merzbow)
 * (known to be Merzbow)


 * Code letter: G


 * Supporting evidence:
 * 1) Supergreenred:  - “muhahahaa now you know my IP”
 * 2) Merzbow: - “muhahaha now everyone knows my IP”
 * 3) Merbow: - “Sheesh, both sides are off-track here.”
 * 4) Supergreenred: - “Sheesh. This is a big waste of time. Wikipedia is seriously getting off-track…”
 * 5) Supergreenred: - “At least until there are new FACTS.”
 * 6) Merbow: -“…should be allowed to quote FACTS about what

Though the two users are extremely close in proximity, they have no shared edit period:
 * April 13th
 * Merzbow
 * 5:35 -> 6:04 (6)
 * Supergreenred
 * 08:05 -> 9:21 (6)
 * Merzbow
 * 18:05 (1)
 * Supergreenred
 * 21:07 -> 22:01 (15)
 * April 14th
 * Supergreenred
 * 00:04 -> 00:17 (7)
 * Merzbow
 * 00:29 -> 00:47 (6)
 * 08:04 (1)
 * Supergreenred
 * 09:44 -> 11:22 (14)
 * Merzbow
 * 18:09 -> 23:54 (5)
 * April 15th
 * Merzbow:
 * 1:15 -> 1:28
 * Supergreenred
 * 4:56 -> 11:31
 * Merzbow
 * 17:39 -> 22:51
 * April 29th
 * Merzbow
 * 3:15 -> 3:19 (3)
 * Supergreenred
 * 5:56 -> 6:02 (2)
 * Merzbow
 * 7:51 -> 22:16 (16)
 * April 30th
 * Merzbow
 * 00:01 -> 3:13 (12)
 * Supergreenred
 * 7:00 -> 8:00 (7)
 * Merzbow
 * 18:09 -> 23:47 (17)

The evidence is presented Suspected sock puppets/Merzbow. It would be easier if I do not need to retype, however a summary entails: Same geographic region, edit the same articles, same linguistic characteristics such as "Sheesh" and the use of capitalizations to drive a point, example on page of the word "FACTS." Same linguistic response to their IP being revealed. I believe its possible the IP's may have crossed accounts, possibly by accident, or at least they may have edited from eachothers ISP. Requesting "technical" evidence to go along with the SSP report. I Write Stuff (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This must be rejected on procedural grounds; per WP:RFCU, requests related to an ongoing ArbCom case must be presented there. - Merzbow (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Except that the Arbcom case is against Giovanni33, not you, and its not evidence, unless something is found. --I Write Stuff (talk) 00:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Check again. "related to an ongoing ArbCom case" is the text. - Merzbow (talk) 00:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * And since you are not the subject of the case, it is not related to it. What are you afraid will appear? --I Write Stuff (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Merzbow and Supergreenred are ❌. However, ✅ that I Write Stuff is  and  that he is also  and . Thatcher 10:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''