Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mikehamilton

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Mikehamilton (2nd)

 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: A new single use account has made an appearance on the AFD, again directing users to google; [1] in the same way that the other sockpuppets had previously tried; againt trying multiple voting rather than marking comments as comments. Archiveally was checked as a sockpuppet and banned by User:FisherQueen Archiveula is another SPA account voting on the AFD, although this time adding supporting evidence. Which is nice, however multiple votes from the same user in the AFD isn't. --Blowdart | talk 12:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)--Blowdart | talk 21:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: A new single use account has made an appearance on the AFD, again directing users to google; [1] in the same way that the other sockpuppets had previously tried; againt trying multiple voting rather than marking comments as comments. Archiveally was checked as a sockpuppet and banned by User:FisherQueen Archiveula is another SPA account voting on the AFD, although this time adding supporting evidence. Which is nice, however multiple votes from the same user in the AFD isn't. --Blowdart | talk 12:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)--Blowdart | talk 21:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence: A new single use account has made an appearance on the AFD, again directing users to google; [1] in the same way that the other sockpuppets had previously tried; againt trying multiple voting rather than marking comments as comments. Archiveally was checked as a sockpuppet and banned by User:FisherQueen Archiveula is another SPA account voting on the AFD, although this time adding supporting evidence. Which is nice, however multiple votes from the same user in the AFD isn't. --Blowdart | talk 12:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)--Blowdart | talk 21:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

These three are a ✅ match. Mikehamilton was previously blocked but is now un. FisherQueen already blocked Archiveally, and I just now blocked Archiveula too. I'd block Mikehamilton as well for repeat evasion. ++Lar: t/c 23:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

All three accounts have been indef blocked & tagged. Tiptoety talk 23:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Mikehamilton



 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: User Mikehamilton created what appears to be an autobiography. He has objected to the AFD and removed the AFD templates. After much edits suddenly Flatnine appears, removing the AFD template, . This was reverted numerous times; but flatnine persisted, and ended up blocked for 24 hours. That account also added instructions to google as a reference; . The IP address then deleted the AFD tag;, followed by another removal by flatnine, . Flatnine also edited the AFD to take ownership of previous comments by mikehamilton, This morning a new user, Twelvetone appears, adding google as a reference again, exhibiting the same type of edit as Flatnine, , as well as voting in the AFD , in what looks like an attempt to rig the vote. --Blowdart | talk 05:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - all of the above - A l is o n  ❤ 05:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Main account While the other two accounts have been indef  -  Tiptoety  talk 05:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --Blowdart | talk 05:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Is it up to me to change the sockpuppet tag on the twelvetone and flatnine user pages, or does an admin do it? --Blowdart | talk 05:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's okay - I just did it. But yes, after a case is done, you can update them yourself - A l is o n  ❤ 05:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah thank you very much; my first checkuser (I think), I feel so warm and fuzzy inside. --Blowdart | talk 05:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * As a general rule of thumb, if I am going to only block the sockpuppeteer for a short period of time (or anything other than indef) I do not tag the other accounts he/she was using. That is done simply so that users do not click on the sock template directing them to a unblocked user, and causing confusion. Often times I will just stick indef on there instead of the sock template. Tiptoety  talk 05:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''