Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MinaretDk

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

MinaretDk





 * Code letter: F (Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar (includes user:BhaiSaab, MinaretDk's block as a result of edit-warring on Persecution of Hindus, user talk:Rumpelstiltskin223 and this ANI report)

MinaretDk and Neptunion have been edit-warring from a pro-Islam, anti-Hindu angle on articles related to Hinduism, especially on controversial subjects such as Persecution of Hindus, 2002 Gujarat violence, Hindutva. The MinaretDk account was created just as BhaiSaab was banned for 1 year and Neptunion was created when MinaretDk was blocked for disruption for 1 week. Both editors have shown some intrinsic knowledge of the Hkelkar ArbCom case, IP addresses and the functioning of some complex WP policies. Rama's arrow 00:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * , as far as IP analysis is concerned; no IP or geographic correlation. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed Minaret and Nueptunion are not teh same, but based on reviewing saved records (both BhaiSaab and TerryJ-Ho are old accounts) MinaretDk is BhaiSaab, while Neptunion is  TerryJ-Ho. Dmcdevit·t 04:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, both blocked and bans reset. TerryJ-Ho did forget to log in once on my userpage, and BS also.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually, User:MinaretDk is User:His excellency (also banned). They edit from the same general area, and (at a minimum) are in communication off-wiki, which sometimes makes it hard to tell. There is also a real possibility that they are the same editor. Jayjg (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Having looked at his contributions, this is clearly User:His excellency. Tom Harrison Talk 14:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''