Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Miracleimpulse

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Miracleimpulse
 view edit history watch Filed: 16:23, December 22 2006 (UTC)




 * Code letter: N/A

There is a requested sockpuppet investigation at Suspected sock puppets/miracleimpulse, but I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to clear some of these suspected sockpuppets and I've offered on behalf of User:Meisterchef to open a checkuser request to clear him as he is currently blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Miracleimpulse. User:meisterchef has stated on his talk page that 68.60.17.31 is his IP and User:Eyetomhas is an earlier account he'd registered (and as there is no concurrent editing here I don't see this as a WP:SOCK violation). User:Miracleimpulse edits from IP 24.12.179.210. Basically I'd like a checkuser on the alleged puppetmaster User:Miracleimpulse. If User:Miracleimpulse has never edited from 68.60.17.31 or any IP in that range (and User:Meisterchef has no edits from 24.12.179.210), then I think it would be safe to say User:Meisterchef is not him and he should probably be unblocked as an indef based on one edit in support of User:Miracleimpulse's position is overkill unless there is strong checkuser evidence he is a sock.--Isotope23 16:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved the above request from Requests for checkuser/Pending and tidied it up a bit. Wasn't sure which code letter to apply; if DB could have a look (or will ask requesting editor). Luna Santin 16:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure which code to use either, so I left it blank. I'm requesting this on behalf of someone on indef block, essentially because they swear they are not a sockpuppet and based on a couple of tells I'm inclined to believe he is telling the truth.--Isotope23 16:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * N/A sounds good. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 22:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

❌. I see no signs of any kind of sockpuppetry here. Essjay  ( Talk )  01:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''